BEDZ vs. XMLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) to PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV)
BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

BEDZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the hotel business. It may also invest in companies involved in other lodging and travel-related services. The fund invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ?ADRs. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.85

Average Daily Volume

438

Number of Holdings *

26

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$54.67

Average Daily Volume

48,764

Number of Holdings *

79

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BEDZ XMLV
30 Days -4.13% -2.59%
60 Days -0.81% 1.51%
90 Days 2.98% 3.89%
12 Months 20.23% 7.44%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BEDZ Weight in XMLV Overlap
GLPI F 3.05% 1.37% 1.37%
WH D 3.35% 0.96% 0.96%
BEDZ Overweight 24 Positions Relative to XMLV
Symbol Grade Weight
TCOM B 5.82%
RCL A 5.22%
MAR C 4.73%
BKNG C 4.73%
TH B 4.63%
RHP C 4.57%
PK C 4.57%
EXPE B 4.56%
BYD F 4.5%
TRIP B 4.5%
HST C 4.46%
XHR D 4.22%
MGM F 4.18%
VICI C 3.85%
HLT C 3.82%
RLJ D 3.75%
APLE F 3.35%
HGV D 3.24%
HTHT B 3.09%
H C 2.41%
IHG C 2.25%
ABNB B 1.84%
GHG D 1.55%
MCRI C 1.47%
BEDZ Underweight 77 Positions Relative to XMLV
Symbol Grade Weight
PNM D -1.86%
MDU A -1.62%
SEIC C -1.6%
ATR A -1.55%
DTM B -1.49%
TXRH A -1.46%
ORI A -1.46%
CACI A -1.45%
CW A -1.44%
NFG A -1.42%
POST A -1.42%
SNX A -1.41%
NNN C -1.41%
IDA B -1.41%
BWXT C -1.41%
DCI A -1.4%
INGR B -1.4%
ADC B -1.39%
AM A -1.38%
NWE B -1.37%
OGE A -1.36%
CASY A -1.36%
CHE F -1.35%
NJR B -1.34%
ACM A -1.33%
MUSA A -1.33%
AIRC A -1.32%
WEN B -1.32%
FLO B -1.29%
MTG B -1.29%
SIGI D -1.27%
KBR A -1.27%
SR A -1.27%
POR B -1.26%
USFD C -1.25%
OGS B -1.25%
BJ A -1.25%
EHC A -1.25%
MSM D -1.24%
GHC C -1.21%
GATX D -1.21%
WTRG B -1.2%
RGA A -1.19%
AFG C -1.19%
RS D -1.19%
OHI B -1.19%
AVT A -1.18%
SON B -1.18%
NEU D -1.18%
CVLT B -1.17%
ESNT C -1.17%
ALE A -1.17%
THG D -1.16%
GNTX C -1.15%
LECO D -1.15%
BKH B -1.15%
COLM B -1.14%
STAG F -1.13%
DLB D -1.12%
SAIC C -1.12%
HLI B -1.11%
FHI F -1.11%
FR F -1.09%
LSTR D -1.09%
NBIX B -1.08%
EGP F -1.08%
PFGC D -1.08%
WPC D -1.07%
ELS F -1.07%
BRX C -1.05%
EPR D -1.05%
FNF B -1.05%
CHH C -1.05%
PCH F -1.04%
PRI F -0.99%
G F -0.97%
WERN F -0.94%
Compare ETFs