AMID vs. RULE ETF Comparison

Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to Adaptive Core ETF (RULE)
AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.72

Average Daily Volume

7,812

Number of Holdings *

37

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RULE

Adaptive Core ETF

RULE Description Adaptive Core ETF seeks current income. The fund invests in individual equity securities without regard to market capitalization and ETFs that invest in equity securities of any market capitalization including convertible equity securities and fixed income ETFs. The fund’s portfolio may hold securities from issuers of any market capitalization, credit quality, maturity, or country. Fixed income securities may include securities with credit quality below investment grade (commonly referred to as “junk bond” credit quality).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$23.19

Average Daily Volume

5,927

Number of Holdings *

35

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period AMID RULE
30 Days 4.32% 4.17%
60 Days 3.96% 5.40%
90 Days 4.88% 5.82%
12 Months 34.06% 21.04%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in AMID Weight in RULE Overlap
CTAS B 3.66% 2.84% 2.84%
FTNT C 3.34% 2.67% 2.67%
URI C 2.35% 2.57% 2.35%
AMID Overweight 34 Positions Relative to RULE
Symbol Grade Weight
FICO B 3.79%
CPRT B 3.56%
BLDR D 3.43%
HLI A 3.2%
CBZ B 2.93%
LPLA A 2.87%
CDW F 2.86%
VCTR B 2.86%
DHI F 2.85%
IT C 2.83%
MEDP D 2.69%
MUSA B 2.63%
HCA F 2.49%
BAH F 2.45%
BLD D 2.43%
OMF A 2.4%
AFG A 2.28%
GDDY A 2.24%
A D 2.12%
ADUS D 2.09%
CG B 2.05%
SCI B 2.05%
TPX B 1.99%
AME A 1.98%
ICFI F 1.93%
LNG A 1.69%
CHDN B 1.57%
ABG C 1.55%
ENTG D 1.52%
MOH F 1.44%
PATK C 1.35%
TTEK F 1.33%
AX B 1.11%
EXPO D 0.99%
AMID Underweight 32 Positions Relative to RULE
Symbol Grade Weight
BIL A -4.27%
JPST A -4.26%
CRM B -3.6%
APO B -3.39%
WMB A -3.07%
EQIX A -3.05%
PCAR B -3.04%
XLG B -3.04%
AON A -3.04%
SPHQ A -3.03%
CAH B -3.0%
VST A -2.96%
INTU B -2.95%
V A -2.95%
IWF B -2.91%
FI A -2.91%
BK A -2.88%
PH A -2.87%
GWW B -2.82%
UBER F -2.8%
NFLX A -2.78%
PGR A -2.72%
HD B -2.7%
RMD C -2.65%
FCNCA A -2.59%
GPN B -2.51%
IRM C -2.47%
VRT B -2.41%
IBM C -2.35%
PAYX B -2.18%
ADBE C -1.94%
ARES A -1.81%
Compare ETFs