AMID vs. PCGG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG)
AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.74

Average Daily Volume

7,573

Number of Holdings *

37

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PCGG

Polen Capital Global Growth ETF

PCGG Description The fund is a non-diversified, actively-managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a focused portfolio of approximately 25 to 40 common stocks of large capitalization companies that are located anywhere in the world, including companies in both developed and emerging markets, and, in the opinion of the sub-advisor to the fund, have a sustainable competitive advantage. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$11.46

Average Daily Volume

47,388

Number of Holdings *

21

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period AMID PCGG
30 Days -1.11% 0.19%
60 Days -0.43% 0.10%
90 Days 5.40% 5.54%
12 Months 36.76% 21.01%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in AMID Weight in PCGG Overlap
AMID Overweight 37 Positions Relative to PCGG
Symbol Grade Weight
FICO B 6.35%
CTAS B 3.69%
CDW F 3.59%
BLDR F 3.54%
CPRT D 3.33%
DHI D 3.28%
HCA D 3.08%
HLI A 3.02%
FTNT B 2.96%
IT C 2.86%
MEDP F 2.76%
VCTR A 2.72%
BAH A 2.7%
CBZ B 2.59%
BLD F 2.59%
MUSA C 2.46%
URI B 2.41%
ADUS D 2.31%
A D 2.26%
ICFI B 2.21%
AFG D 2.21%
CG B 2.06%
LPLA A 1.91%
TPX F 1.82%
OMF A 1.79%
AME A 1.78%
SCI A 1.68%
TTEK B 1.64%
ENTG D 1.61%
CHDN B 1.56%
GDDY A 1.54%
LNG A 1.53%
PATK F 1.44%
ABG C 1.42%
MOH D 1.35%
EXPO D 1.12%
AX B 0.95%
AMID Underweight 21 Positions Relative to PCGG
Symbol Grade Weight
AMZN A -9.22%
GOOG A -7.72%
MSFT D -5.96%
MA B -4.62%
ABT A -4.56%
ADBE F -4.24%
V A -4.19%
WDAY F -4.12%
MSCI C -4.1%
AON A -4.03%
SHOP B -3.88%
ICLR F -3.35%
PAYC A -3.06%
TMO D -2.85%
ACN C -2.73%
GLOB B -2.42%
NOW A -2.27%
ZTS D -2.14%
ABNB B -1.62%
ORCL B -1.53%
ADP A -1.47%
Compare ETFs