XHS vs. SMLL ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL)

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$93.99

Average Daily Volume

4,053

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SMLL

Harbor Active Small Cap ETF

SMLL Description

The investment seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the daily performance of the Russell 2000® Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowing for investment purposes) in financial instruments, such as swap agreements, and securities of the index, ETFs that track the index and other financial instruments that provide daily leveraged exposure to the index or ETFs that track the index. The index measures the performance of approximately 2,000 small-cap companies in the Russell 3000® Index, based on a combination of their market capitalization and current index membership. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.32

Average Daily Volume

3,240

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XHS	SMLL
30 Days	-0.95%	0.35%
60 Days	-4.85%	3.30%
90 Days	-3.13%
12 Months	18.61%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in XHS	Weight in SMLL	Overlap
	USPH	F	1.52%	1.76%	1.52%

XHS Overweight 57 Positions Relative to SMLL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	B	2.4%
HQY	B	2.3%
EHC	A	2.25%
LH	A	2.18%
ENSG	A	2.14%
RCM	A	2.13%
DGX	B	2.12%
HSIC	D	2.11%
PINC	A	2.1%
CVS	F	2.06%
AMED	C	2.06%
MCK	C	2.04%
RDNT	D	2.03%
PDCO	F	2.03%
THC	C	2.02%
ADUS	D	2.02%
CAH	B	2.02%
UNH	C	2.01%
COR	A	2.01%
CHE	F	1.98%
SGRY	F	1.96%
HCA	D	1.92%
SEM	B	1.92%
MOH	D	1.89%
UHS	D	1.85%
CI	D	1.82%
PRVA	B	1.8%
DVA	D	1.8%
BKD	D	1.75%
CNC	D	1.74%
GH	D	1.72%
AMN	F	1.7%
CLOV	A	1.69%
HUM	F	1.69%
OMI	F	1.55%
ELV	F	1.55%
AGL	F	1.53%
OPCH	F	1.52%
CRVL	D	1.43%
CSTL	A	1.4%
PGNY	F	1.32%
ASTH	C	1.31%
AHCO	D	1.29%
NEO	D	1.26%
MD	A	1.19%
LFST	C	1.17%
ACHC	F	1.15%
ALHC	A	1.11%
NHC	C	0.94%
PNTG	D	0.72%
CCRN	F	0.68%
CYH	D	0.65%
OPK	C	0.61%
ACCD	F	0.57%
MODV	F	0.53%
FLGT	C	0.51%
NRC	F	0.3%

XHS Underweight 39 Positions Relative to SMLL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SSNC	D	-5.17%
LBRT	F	-4.59%
DOCS	A	-4.42%
KNSL	F	-4.18%
ZG	D	-3.56%
RS	C	-3.48%
PCTY	A	-3.44%
FOUR	B	-3.14%
WTFC	B	-2.86%
JBI	F	-2.71%
APAM	A	-2.68%
RLJ	F	-2.45%
ATR	A	-2.42%
HAYW	A	-2.34%
LYFT	C	-2.19%
PLOW	F	-2.09%
WRBY	A	-1.97%
LSTR	D	-1.96%
FRSH	C	-1.93%
NNN	D	-1.86%
OSCR	C	-1.85%
QTWO	A	-1.62%
MORN	B	-1.59%
PECO	B	-1.59%
FBIN	C	-1.59%
MC	D	-1.51%
MCRI	A	-1.49%
WSC	F	-1.33%
SAM	C	-1.28%
EWCZ	C	-1.24%
CMS	C	-1.24%
CHWY	D	-1.21%
NWE	D	-1.19%
BECN	B	-1.09%
RL	B	-1.08%
RBC	D	-1.06%
TRUE	A	-0.93%
REYN	F	-0.87%
PCOR	B	-0.58%