SOCL vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X Social Media Index ETF (SOCL) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
SOCL

Global X Social Media Index ETF

SOCL Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Solactive Social Media Total Return Index. The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index and in American Depositary Receipts and Global Depositary Receipts based on the securities in the underlying index. The underlying index tracks the equity performance of the largest and most liquid companies involved in the social media industry, including companies that provide social networking, file sharing, and other web-based media applications. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.67

Average Daily Volume

10,406

Number of Holdings *

30

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.20

Average Daily Volume

193,594

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period SOCL PGJ
30 Days 1.13% -5.62%
60 Days 3.66% 9.95%
90 Days 5.25% 16.21%
12 Months 6.57% 0.93%
8 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in SOCL Weight in PGJ Overlap
BIDU F 4.28% 6.21% 4.28%
BILI D 2.31% 1.27% 1.27%
DOYU C 0.06% 0.11% 0.06%
HUYA F 0.1% 0.17% 0.1%
MOMO D 0.39% 0.68% 0.39%
NTES D 4.96% 3.64% 3.64%
TME D 3.45% 3.6% 3.45%
WB D 0.3% 0.44% 0.3%
SOCL Overweight 22 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
META D 9.88%
PINS D 7.61%
SPOT B 6.11%
GOOGL C 5.06%
SNAP C 4.95%
RDDT B 4.28%
MTCH D 3.49%
IAC D 1.54%
LIF D 1.29%
YELP C 1.03%
DJT C 0.88%
SPT C 0.61%
YY C 0.53%
VMEO B 0.4%
FVRR B 0.37%
CXM C 0.35%
BMBL C 0.33%
GRND A 0.18%
YALA D 0.17%
GRPN F 0.07%
ANGI D 0.06%
GCBC C 0.06%
SOCL Underweight 46 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC C -9.52%
TCOM B -8.84%
JD D -8.37%
BABA D -7.56%
BEKE D -4.54%
ZTO F -3.39%
NIO F -3.36%
VIPS F -3.32%
HTHT D -3.26%
YMM C -3.11%
LI F -2.65%
BZ F -2.57%
QFIN B -2.33%
TAL F -2.25%
XPEV C -1.55%
GDS C -1.34%
ATAT C -1.18%
ATHM D -1.06%
DQ F -0.87%
ZLAB C -0.77%
RLX C -0.67%
IQ F -0.67%
FINV B -0.65%
MNSO F -0.53%
JKS F -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH F -0.45%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL C -0.34%
VNET B -0.28%
QD C -0.27%
LX C -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH D -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC A -0.19%
RERE B -0.18%
API C -0.15%
DAO B -0.11%
TUYA F -0.11%
WDH F -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS C -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs