SMIG vs. QVAL ETF Comparison

Comparison of AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) to ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL)
SMIG

AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF

SMIG Description

ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is an exchange traded fund launched by ETF Series Solutions. The fund is co-managed by Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Bahl & Gaynor, Inc. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization, within the market capitalization range of the Russell 2500 Index. The fund invests in dividend paying stocks of companies. It employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.19

Average Daily Volume

72,370

Number of Holdings *

44

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QVAL

ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

QVAL Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$43.55

Average Daily Volume

25,741

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period SMIG QVAL
30 Days -2.04% -2.66%
60 Days 3.08% 5.01%
90 Days 4.31% 7.28%
12 Months 15.13% 35.38%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in SMIG Weight in QVAL Overlap
IPG C 0.35% 1.98% 0.35%
SNA D 3.74% 1.9% 1.9%
SMIG Overweight 42 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol Grade Weight
BAH C 5.12%
HUBB A 4.8%
BR D 4.37%
VCTR A 4.16%
DOX D 3.71%
WSO A 3.56%
TRGP A 3.49%
HIG D 3.31%
PKG D 3.27%
NI A 3.11%
IPAR F 3.03%
EVR D 3.03%
DGX A 2.99%
PRGO A 2.85%
AVY B 2.72%
NTAP A 2.5%
AFG D 2.43%
LANC D 2.27%
ADC B 2.24%
AVT A 2.03%
HOMB A 1.97%
PAGP A 1.95%
RPM D 1.92%
ATO A 1.91%
TRNO F 1.87%
LNT A 1.86%
CSGS F 1.77%
TXRH A 1.64%
CBOE D 1.61%
CAG A 1.6%
NXST D 1.57%
AVNT A 1.56%
FFBC A 1.33%
ELS F 1.17%
PAG B 1.15%
NSP B 1.09%
SON C 0.91%
MTH B 0.9%
CMS A 0.89%
HBAN A 0.66%
USPH C 0.55%
FIBK B 0.36%
SMIG Underweight 47 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol Grade Weight
SNX A -2.25%
LBRT A -2.25%
DAL A -2.15%
BG B -2.15%
WFRD A -2.15%
ELV A -2.12%
SIG B -2.11%
OMC A -2.08%
AMR B -2.08%
CRC A -2.07%
ARCH B -2.07%
ARW A -2.06%
INSW A -2.05%
CCK B -2.05%
MUSA A -2.05%
PSX B -2.04%
SM A -2.04%
ALSN B -2.04%
MO A -2.02%
OC A -2.02%
HAL B -2.02%
AGCO B -2.02%
SKX B -2.0%
T C -2.0%
VLO B -2.0%
TPH A -1.99%
TEX B -1.99%
CSCO D -1.98%
UTHR B -1.98%
THC D -1.95%
PHM B -1.95%
UFPI C -1.94%
CEIX B -1.94%
GPK A -1.93%
CMCSA F -1.92%
CVI D -1.9%
CTSH D -1.9%
LEA D -1.9%
TOL B -1.9%
HPQ D -1.9%
APA B -1.89%
TMHC B -1.88%
BBY D -1.86%
DHI D -1.84%
MOH F -1.81%
CROX C -1.8%
CRI F -1.79%
Compare ETFs