QVAL vs. RNEW ETF Comparison
Comparison of ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) to VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF (RNEW)
QVAL
ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
QVAL Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$46.14
Average Daily Volume
18,767
50
RNEW
VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF
RNEW Description
The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities of Green Infrastructure Companies. The index is a U.S. index that tracks the performance of Green Infrastructure Companies. "Green Infrastructure Companies" are companies that seek to positively impact the environment through the production, transmission, or distribution of green energy and/or through the establishment of sustainable infrastructure to facilitate the use of green energy. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.29
Average Daily Volume
132
39
Performance
| Period | QVAL | RNEW |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 1.96% | 4.52% |
| 60 Days | 1.90% | 1.13% |
| 90 Days | 3.12% | -0.95% |
| 12 Months | 25.13% | 12.92% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in QVAL | Weight in RNEW | Overlap |
|---|
QVAL Overweight 50 Positions Relative to RNEW
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPR | B | 2.28% | |
| BKR | A | 2.26% | |
| UAL | A | 2.22% | |
| MO | A | 2.19% | |
| TAP | C | 2.18% | |
| FTI | A | 2.15% | |
| ALSN | B | 2.14% | |
| HES | B | 2.14% | |
| FOXA | A | 2.12% | |
| LRN | A | 2.12% | |
| GTES | A | 2.11% | |
| DAL | B | 2.1% | |
| SNA | A | 2.1% | |
| WFRD | D | 2.07% | |
| TGT | F | 2.07% | |
| URBN | C | 2.06% | |
| SM | B | 2.06% | |
| ANF | F | 2.05% | |
| SIG | B | 2.02% | |
| JBL | C | 2.02% | |
| CTSH | B | 2.02% | |
| TOL | B | 2.01% | |
| MHK | D | 2.0% | |
| HPQ | B | 2.0% | |
| CMCSA | B | 1.99% | |
| MMM | D | 1.99% | |
| TEX | F | 1.99% | |
| UTHR | C | 1.98% | |
| WSM | C | 1.97% | |
| CAT | B | 1.97% | |
| HRB | D | 1.96% | |
| CVS | D | 1.95% | |
| GPK | C | 1.95% | |
| BBY | D | 1.94% | |
| DKS | D | 1.94% | |
| LEN | D | 1.92% | |
| CNH | C | 1.9% | |
| ELV | F | 1.9% | |
| THC | D | 1.89% | |
| OMC | C | 1.89% | |
| LYB | F | 1.88% | |
| CNC | D | 1.87% | |
| FCX | F | 1.87% | |
| UHS | D | 1.87% | |
| CRI | F | 1.85% | |
| IPG | D | 1.8% | |
| MAT | D | 1.78% | |
| MOH | F | 1.76% | |
| ASO | F | 1.76% | |
| CROX | D | 1.7% |
QVAL Underweight 39 Positions Relative to RNEW
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | B | -9.97% | |
| LNG | A | -6.86% | |
| PWR | A | -6.03% | |
| CLH | C | -6.0% | |
| RSG | A | -5.71% | |
| WM | B | -5.62% | |
| ECL | D | -5.24% | |
| DCI | B | -4.93% | |
| RIVN | F | -4.73% | |
| BWA | D | -4.14% | |
| FSLR | F | -3.26% | |
| CWST | A | -3.22% | |
| IDA | A | -3.11% | |
| ITRI | C | -2.99% | |
| SWX | B | -2.9% | |
| LCID | F | -2.83% | |
| ORA | B | -2.65% | |
| ENPH | F | -2.39% | |
| NWE | B | -1.77% | |
| BE | B | -1.62% | |
| CWEN | C | -1.21% | |
| RUN | F | -1.19% | |
| NFE | D | -1.05% | |
| NEP | F | -0.85% | |
| PLUG | F | -0.77% | |
| SPH | C | -0.63% | |
| ERII | D | -0.6% | |
| ARRY | F | -0.53% | |
| SHLS | F | -0.52% | |
| AMRC | F | -0.52% | |
| REX | D | -0.45% | |
| MNTK | F | -0.4% | |
| MEG | F | -0.39% | |
| GPRE | F | -0.38% | |
| CLNE | F | -0.36% | |
| AMPS | C | -0.29% | |
| CHPT | F | -0.27% | |
| NOVA | F | -0.23% | |
| SES | F | -0.06% |
QVAL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RNEW: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
