QLTY vs. EQRR ETF Comparison

Comparison of GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) to ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR)
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.75

Average Daily Volume

265,453

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
EQRR

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF

EQRR Description The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the Nasdaq U.S. Large Cap Equities for Rising Rates Index (the index). The fund invests in securities that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should track the performance of the index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. The index consists of 50 companies whose stock prices historically have tended to outperform the Universe during periods of rising interest rates.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$62.69

Average Daily Volume

778

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period QLTY EQRR
30 Days 1.40% 6.99%
60 Days 0.46% 7.58%
90 Days 2.30% 7.33%
12 Months 26.48% 26.30%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in QLTY Weight in EQRR Overlap
HLT A 2.62% 1.51% 1.51%
STZ D 1.59% 2.18% 1.59%
WFC A 2.45% 2.51% 2.45%
QLTY Overweight 31 Positions Relative to EQRR
Symbol Grade Weight
MSFT F 6.46%
AAPL C 5.33%
ORCL B 4.71%
META D 4.5%
GOOGL C 4.43%
JNJ D 4.24%
ABT B 4.17%
UNH C 3.62%
TXN C 3.53%
ACN C 3.3%
V A 3.22%
PG A 3.2%
ISRG A 2.92%
KLAC D 2.85%
LRCX F 2.85%
CRM B 2.84%
KO D 2.81%
ARMK B 2.56%
ELV F 2.5%
AVGO D 2.45%
MRK F 2.41%
AMZN C 2.4%
USB A 2.31%
OTIS C 2.25%
TJX A 2.14%
GE D 1.73%
MDLZ F 1.72%
LLY F 1.61%
CI F 1.49%
DGX A 1.35%
TMO F 0.91%
QLTY Underweight 47 Positions Relative to EQRR
Symbol Grade Weight
CTRA B -3.25%
HAL C -3.13%
EOG A -3.11%
MCK B -3.02%
FANG D -3.01%
COP C -3.0%
XOM B -2.96%
SLB C -2.93%
VLO C -2.91%
PSX C -2.82%
MPC D -2.74%
LPLA A -2.62%
MO A -2.57%
COR B -2.56%
RJF A -2.5%
CTVA C -2.43%
UAL A -2.29%
JPM A -2.18%
CVS D -2.18%
BG F -2.12%
HSY F -2.12%
CPB D -2.11%
ADM D -2.08%
WRB A -2.06%
RGA A -1.99%
PRU A -1.96%
MET A -1.94%
AIG B -1.94%
HIG B -1.92%
DAL C -1.73%
GM B -1.68%
MAR B -1.57%
FOXA B -1.55%
ORLY B -1.47%
AZO C -1.33%
UBER D -1.29%
GPC D -1.22%
IP B -1.13%
STLD B -1.08%
FAST B -1.08%
RS B -1.02%
CF B -0.99%
NUE C -0.94%
LIN D -0.89%
WLK D -0.81%
FCX D -0.8%
LYB F -0.8%
Compare ETFs