PSCT vs. EBLU ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (PSCT) to Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU)
PSCT

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio

PSCT Description

The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600® Capped Information Technology Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US information technology companies. These companies are principally engaged in the business of providing information technology-related products and services, including computer hardware and software, Internet, electronics and semiconductors and communication technologies. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.40

Average Daily Volume

18,793

Number of Holdings *

61

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
EBLU

Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund

EBLU Description The Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund uses a passive management approach and seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and distribution rate performance of the Tortoise Global Water ESG Net Total Return Index®, which is comprised of companies across the globe and throughout the water cycle that we believe are positioned to benefit from the pursuit of solving the water supply/demand imbalance.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.72

Average Daily Volume

2,442

Number of Holdings *

23

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PSCT EBLU
30 Days -0.51% 4.10%
60 Days -1.44% 9.81%
90 Days -3.83% 6.62%
12 Months 8.85% 20.15%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PSCT Weight in EBLU Overlap
BMI C 3.29% 1.7% 1.7%
PSCT Overweight 60 Positions Relative to EBLU
Symbol Grade Weight
FN D 5.01%
SPSC D 4.68%
NSIT D 3.59%
DV D 3.28%
BOX C 2.87%
ITRI C 2.85%
DXC F 2.62%
ACLS F 2.58%
SEDG F 2.57%
ALRM C 2.55%
AEIS F 2.54%
ACIW B 2.44%
SANM C 2.37%
FORM C 2.36%
BL C 2.25%
DIOD F 2.19%
ENV C 1.97%
KLIC D 1.95%
IDCC D 1.89%
PLXS F 1.78%
PRGS F 1.61%
RAMP D 1.58%
OSIS B 1.51%
VIAV D 1.51%
PLUS D 1.43%
UCTT C 1.41%
ROG D 1.39%
VECO C 1.39%
PRFT F 1.38%
CALX F 1.37%
XRX D 1.35%
PLAB D 1.26%
SITM F 1.15%
AGYS D 1.11%
CXM D 1.11%
NTCT D 1.06%
TTMI D 1.05%
EXTR F 1.05%
HLIT C 1.04%
SMTC C 1.03%
COHU F 1.02%
CTS C 1.0%
KN F 0.96%
SGH C 0.95%
MXL F 0.94%
VSAT F 0.9%
ARLO B 0.84%
ICHR D 0.77%
DGII C 0.77%
SCSC C 0.75%
BHE D 0.72%
PDFS D 0.71%
ATEN C 0.67%
NABL F 0.64%
CNXN D 0.51%
CRNC F 0.43%
CEVA C 0.38%
CRSR F 0.36%
AOSL F 0.35%
MEI F 0.3%
PSCT Underweight 22 Positions Relative to EBLU
Symbol Grade Weight
ECL A -7.47%
XYL B -7.44%
AWK F -6.04%
VLTO B -5.07%
WMS B -4.12%
PNR B -4.05%
IEX B -3.96%
AOS A -3.95%
TTEK B -3.55%
CNM A -3.48%
WTRG C -3.36%
WTS B -2.07%
ZWS B -1.69%
FELE B -1.5%
CWT F -0.98%
MWA C -0.9%
SJW F -0.6%
LNN F -0.46%
MEG C -0.4%
ERII F -0.32%
WTTR B -0.27%
ANET A -0.12%
Compare ETFs