PGJ vs. ONLN ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN)
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.03

Average Daily Volume

65,198

Number of Holdings *

51

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
ONLN

ProShares Online Retail ETF

ONLN Description The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the ProShares Online Retail Index (the index). The fund seeks to invest substantially all of its assets in the stocks that make up the index and generally holds each stock in approximately the same proportion as its weighting in the index. Normally, it will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of publicly traded companies that principally sell online or through other non-store sales channels, rather than through "brick and mortar" store locations. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$38.41

Average Daily Volume

16,506

Number of Holdings *

17

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PGJ ONLN
30 Days -0.28% -2.08%
60 Days -1.38% -0.30%
90 Days 10.51% 15.32%
12 Months -0.33% 34.27%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PGJ Weight in ONLN Overlap
BABA C 8.06% 5.38% 5.38%
JD A 5.04% 2.73% 2.73%
PGJ Overweight 49 Positions Relative to ONLN
Symbol Grade Weight
TCOM A 8.59%
YUMC F 7.33%
BIDU C 7.16%
NTES D 6.17%
TME A 4.74%
ZTO B 4.42%
BEKE A 4.06%
HTHT B 3.75%
VIPS F 3.42%
BZ A 3.39%
YMM A 3.13%
NIO D 2.94%
TAL D 2.92%
LI D 2.29%
QFIN A 1.59%
IQ A 1.38%
ATHM D 1.01%
DQ F 1.0%
MNSO A 0.97%
HOLI D 0.92%
XPEV F 0.88%
BILI B 0.84%
RLX B 0.79%
ATAT F 0.65%
GOTU D 0.6%
MOMO C 0.6%
CSIQ F 0.59%
FINV B 0.56%
JKS D 0.53%
WB B 0.46%
ZLAB F 0.45%
EH B 0.4%
GDS B 0.35%
QD C 0.28%
TIGR D 0.26%
NOAH B 0.25%
HUYA A 0.25%
SOHU A 0.23%
KC D 0.14%
LX D 0.14%
CAN F 0.13%
TUYA D 0.13%
VNET D 0.13%
DADA F 0.13%
API D 0.12%
ZH D 0.11%
DDL D 0.1%
IMAB F 0.08%
DAO F 0.08%
PGJ Underweight 15 Positions Relative to ONLN
Symbol Grade Weight
AMZN B -23.68%
PDD A -10.87%
EBAY A -10.12%
CPNG A -6.01%
ETSY C -4.25%
CHWY F -4.13%
FIGS D -4.09%
RVLV C -3.99%
WSM A -3.97%
BKE D -3.91%
CVNA B -3.81%
W F -3.35%
MELI C -2.83%
SE A -2.71%
GLBE F -1.72%
Compare ETFs