PGJ vs. ERTH ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.54

Average Daily Volume

192,476

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ERTH

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

ERTH Description

The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (Fund) is based on the MSCI Global Environment Select Index (Index). The Fund will generally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is comprised of companies that focus on offering products or services that contribute to a more environmentally sustainable economy by making a more efficient use of global resources. The Index is designed to maximize exposure to six Environmental Impact Themes: alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable water, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable agriculture. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.25

Average Daily Volume

9,570

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PGJ	ERTH
30 Days	-5.37%	-2.79%
60 Days	13.12%	-5.02%
90 Days	17.78%	-3.99%
12 Months	2.29%	-3.19%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in PGJ	Weight in ERTH	Overlap
JKS	F	0.48%	0.16%	0.16%
LI	F	2.65%	3.17%	2.65%
NIO	F	3.36%	1.52%	1.52%
TUYA	D	0.11%	0.08%	0.08%
XPEV	C	1.55%	1.85%	1.55%

PGJ Overweight 49 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
YUMC	C	9.52%
TCOM	B	8.84%
JD	D	8.37%
BABA	D	7.56%
BIDU	F	6.21%
BEKE	D	4.54%
NTES	D	3.64%
TME	D	3.6%
ZTO	F	3.39%
VIPS	F	3.32%
HTHT	D	3.26%
YMM	C	3.11%
BZ	F	2.57%
QFIN	A	2.33%
TAL	F	2.25%
GDS	C	1.34%
BILI	D	1.27%
ATAT	C	1.18%
ATHM	C	1.06%
DQ	F	0.87%
ZLAB	C	0.77%
MOMO	D	0.68%
RLX	C	0.67%
IQ	F	0.67%
FINV	B	0.65%
MNSO	D	0.53%
CSIQ	F	0.45%
EH	D	0.45%
WB	D	0.44%
TIGR	D	0.43%
DDL	C	0.34%
VNET	B	0.28%
QD	B	0.27%
LX	B	0.26%
SOHU	F	0.25%
NOAH	D	0.24%
GOTU	F	0.23%
KC	B	0.19%
RERE	C	0.18%
HUYA	F	0.17%
API	B	0.15%
DAO	B	0.11%
DOYU	C	0.11%
WDH	F	0.1%
DADA	F	0.09%
BZUN	F	0.07%
CAAS	C	0.07%
NIU	F	0.06%
CBAT	F	0.05%

PGJ Underweight 35 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TSLA	B	-7.03%
DLR	B	-5.84%
NVDA	B	-5.76%
FSLR	F	-4.43%
WMS	F	-2.13%
ENPH	F	-2.01%
RIVN	F	-1.77%
VNO	C	-1.58%
BMI	B	-1.55%
DAR	C	-1.54%
MTH	D	-1.53%
KBH	D	-1.38%
WFG	C	-1.2%
CUZ	B	-1.12%
ORA	B	-1.04%
DEI	B	-0.75%
LCID	F	-0.58%
RUN	F	-0.56%
NEP	F	-0.37%
PLUG	F	-0.36%
AAT	B	-0.34%
ARRY	F	-0.27%
ERII	D	-0.25%
BZH	C	-0.23%
BDN	C	-0.21%
PGRE	F	-0.21%
SHLS	F	-0.2%
REX	D	-0.17%
SEDG	F	-0.17%
CHPT	F	-0.1%
RDUS	B	-0.1%
AMPS	C	-0.07%
MNTK	F	-0.06%
MERC	F	-0.06%
RENB	F	-0.05%