PGJ vs. BEDZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ)
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.99
Average Daily Volume
67,595
51
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
BEDZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the hotel business. It may also invest in companies involved in other lodging and travel-related services. The fund invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ?ADRs. It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$28.48
Average Daily Volume
427
27
Performance
| Period | PGJ | BEDZ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 7.36% | -4.79% |
| 60 Days | 10.93% | -1.10% |
| 90 Days | 21.09% | 1.93% |
| 12 Months | 5.66% | 20.13% |
PGJ Overweight 49 Positions Relative to BEDZ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BABA | B | 8.12% | |
| YUMC | F | 7.34% | |
| BIDU | C | 7.28% | |
| NTES | C | 5.86% | |
| JD | B | 5.2% | |
| TME | A | 4.85% | |
| BEKE | B | 4.44% | |
| ZTO | B | 4.37% | |
| BZ | A | 3.49% | |
| VIPS | D | 3.25% | |
| YMM | A | 3.25% | |
| NIO | D | 3.15% | |
| TAL | B | 2.88% | |
| LI | F | 2.31% | |
| IQ | B | 1.51% | |
| QFIN | A | 1.5% | |
| MNSO | B | 0.99% | |
| ATHM | C | 0.98% | |
| XPEV | D | 0.96% | |
| DQ | F | 0.9% | |
| BILI | B | 0.89% | |
| HOLI | D | 0.87% | |
| RLX | B | 0.78% | |
| ATAT | C | 0.62% | |
| CSIQ | F | 0.6% | |
| GOTU | C | 0.58% | |
| MOMO | C | 0.58% | |
| JKS | D | 0.56% | |
| FINV | B | 0.53% | |
| WB | C | 0.47% | |
| ZLAB | F | 0.45% | |
| GDS | C | 0.42% | |
| EH | B | 0.41% | |
| TIGR | D | 0.28% | |
| QD | A | 0.28% | |
| HUYA | B | 0.24% | |
| NOAH | B | 0.24% | |
| SOHU | B | 0.23% | |
| KC | C | 0.15% | |
| VNET | D | 0.14% | |
| LX | D | 0.14% | |
| DADA | D | 0.13% | |
| CAN | F | 0.12% | |
| TUYA | C | 0.12% | |
| DDL | C | 0.11% | |
| API | D | 0.11% | |
| ZH | F | 0.11% | |
| DAO | F | 0.08% | |
| IMAB | F | 0.07% |
PGJ Underweight 25 Positions Relative to BEDZ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| XHR | B | -4.72% | |
| EXPE | F | -4.71% | |
| MAR | D | -4.71% | |
| BKNG | C | -4.7% | |
| TH | C | -4.58% | |
| RHP | D | -4.55% | |
| TRIP | D | -4.55% | |
| PK | D | -4.5% | |
| APLE | F | -4.44% | |
| HST | D | -4.41% | |
| BYD | F | -4.38% | |
| MGM | F | -4.08% | |
| VICI | D | -3.88% | |
| HLT | D | -3.81% | |
| RLJ | D | -3.71% | |
| WH | D | -3.54% | |
| PLYA | C | -3.34% | |
| RCL | A | -3.12% | |
| GLPI | F | -3.05% | |
| H | C | -2.4% | |
| IHG | D | -2.25% | |
| HGV | D | -2.17% | |
| ABNB | D | -1.82% | |
| GHG | D | -1.56% | |
| MCRI | C | -1.48% |
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
BEDZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
