MID vs. IQM ETF Comparison

Comparison of American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) to Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM)
MID

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF

MID Description

The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$55.81

Average Daily Volume

5,181

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
IQM

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

IQM Description The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies that are relevant to its investment theme of intelligent machines. The fund invests predominantly in common stock. Although it may invest across economic sectors, the advisor expects to have significant positions in particular sectors including technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$55.84

Average Daily Volume

2,534

Number of Holdings *

47

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MID IQM
30 Days -1.31% -3.70%
60 Days -1.46% -4.93%
90 Days 7.57% 3.84%
12 Months 27.08% 31.87%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MID Weight in IQM Overlap
CDNS D 5.67% 4.66% 4.66%
DXCM D 3.98% 1.56% 1.56%
INSP B 1.99% 0.28% 0.28%
KEYS C 2.78% 0.9% 0.9%
MID Overweight 30 Positions Relative to IQM
Symbol Grade Weight
MANH F 6.1%
MPWR B 5.59%
RSG B 4.79%
VRT A 4.68%
MSCI F 4.14%
ESI D 4.01%
AVNT A 3.83%
IQV D 3.8%
TT A 3.63%
ABNB D 3.6%
CMG A 3.58%
BFAM D 3.43%
DUOL A 2.94%
CHD B 2.89%
HUBB D 2.81%
XYL A 2.63%
TECH B 2.53%
J C 2.45%
GEHC D 2.11%
ENPH F 1.98%
NTRA A 1.95%
EE B 1.93%
SWAV A 1.64%
ONON C 1.57%
PODD D 1.56%
ARGX C 1.5%
EFX C 0.99%
CNM A 0.98%
ALNY D 0.89%
VKTX B 0.75%
MID Underweight 43 Positions Relative to IQM
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA C -10.75%
ASML D -5.21%
ISRG C -4.94%
SNPS D -4.56%
AAPL C -3.76%
TSM C -3.48%
AXON B -3.43%
AMAT C -3.18%
AMD D -2.74%
PWR A -2.5%
TSLA D -2.44%
PTC D -2.14%
AVGO D -1.85%
ANSS F -1.84%
ENTG D -1.83%
ADI A -1.74%
LRCX D -1.73%
ADSK F -1.68%
TER A -1.65%
APH A -1.63%
KLAC C -1.58%
ETN B -1.46%
IDXX F -1.41%
ALTR D -1.2%
ROP D -0.99%
NXPI B -0.96%
TEL D -0.71%
TXN A -0.68%
TEAM F -0.56%
BSY B -0.54%
VMI B -0.53%
TRMB C -0.49%
MCHP A -0.48%
FSLR B -0.45%
INTC F -0.41%
HON D -0.4%
UBER D -0.31%
PRCT A -0.27%
TXG F -0.16%
SITM D -0.14%
ZBRA A -0.1%
WOLF F -0.08%
ALGN F -0.08%
Compare ETFs