IPDP vs. PRN ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to PowerShares Dynamic Industrials (PRN)

IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.52

Average Daily Volume

1,371

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PRN

PowerShares Dynamic Industrials

PRN Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Industrials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Industrials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 60 US industrial companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of providing industrial products and services, including engineering heavy machinery, construction, electrical equipment, aerospace and defense and general manufacturing. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$130.96

Average Daily Volume

12,093

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IPDP	PRN
30 Days	-5.51%	-5.65%
60 Days	-2.32%	-2.82%
90 Days	1.45%	6.94%
12 Months	23.41%	38.68%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in IPDP	Weight in PRN	Overlap
AIT	D	1.98%	1.57%	1.57%
CTAS	A	2.15%	4.03%	2.15%
ETN	B	2.5%	2.42%	2.42%
GWW	D	2.13%	3.01%	2.13%
TT	A	2.36%	3.2%	2.36%

IPDP Overweight 44 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AVGO	D	2.41%
APOG	A	2.38%
APH	A	2.37%
DOV	A	2.33%
HIG	C	2.32%
QCOM	C	2.26%
TRV	C	2.23%
KLAC	C	2.22%
DCI	B	2.16%
ITT	B	2.15%
RGA	A	2.15%
HI	F	2.15%
MCK	A	2.14%
A	C	2.13%
GPC	B	2.09%
ELV	A	2.08%
SYK	D	2.07%
SEIC	C	2.04%
SHW	D	2.02%
BRC	A	2.01%
FAST	C	2.01%
MSI	B	1.97%
AOS	C	1.96%
HD	D	1.94%
CSX	D	1.94%
ABM	A	1.92%
ADP	B	1.91%
ABT	D	1.89%
PAYX	C	1.87%
WTS	C	1.85%
ROK	F	1.81%
MMC	C	1.81%
CAH	D	1.8%
CSCO	D	1.79%
UPS	F	1.79%
JNJ	D	1.77%
NSP	B	1.76%
SNA	D	1.76%
CHE	D	1.75%
ACN	F	1.69%
UNH	B	1.64%
AAPL	F	1.6%
GL	D	1.15%
HUM	F	1.08%

IPDP Underweight 35 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HEI	A	-3.93%
HUBB	D	-3.61%
VRT	A	-3.61%
FIX	D	-3.59%
CPRT	C	-3.51%
AME	C	-3.44%
PWR	A	-3.3%
BLDR	C	-3.17%
SAIA	F	-3.08%
URI	D	-2.73%
TDG	A	-2.63%
GGG	D	-2.5%
PKG	D	-2.44%
CSL	A	-2.43%
STRL	D	-2.34%
XPO	D	-2.34%
HWM	B	-2.22%
WIRE	A	-2.14%
AXON	B	-2.12%
HRI	D	-2.12%
ARCB	F	-2.01%
BCC	D	-2.0%
DY	A	-1.99%
MYRG	C	-1.95%
CBZ	D	-1.9%
CSWI	A	-1.83%
IESC	A	-1.8%
GFF	C	-1.77%
GMS	C	-1.76%
APG	B	-1.74%
UFPI	D	-1.71%
RUSHA	F	-1.58%
CMPR	D	-1.42%
HEES	F	-1.34%
AMSC	C	-1.27%