IHF vs. AMID ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF) to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID)

IHF

iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF

IHF Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$53.42

Average Daily Volume

61,864

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.72

Average Daily Volume

7,812

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IHF	AMID
30 Days	0.32%	4.32%
60 Days	-6.54%	3.96%
90 Days	-7.21%	4.88%
12 Months	4.98%	34.06%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in IHF	Weight in AMID	Overlap
ADUS	D	0.37%	2.09%	0.37%
HCA	F	4.32%	2.49%	2.49%
MOH	F	2.95%	1.44%	1.44%

IHF Overweight 63 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UNH	B	24.61%
ELV	F	11.41%
CI	D	8.11%
VEEV	C	4.67%
CVS	D	4.65%
HUM	C	4.12%
CNC	D	3.83%
LH	B	3.38%
DGX	A	3.06%
THC	D	2.55%
UHS	D	2.05%
EHC	B	1.7%
HQY	A	1.47%
CHE	D	1.44%
ENSG	C	1.39%
DVA	C	1.27%
DOCS	C	1.06%
RDNT	B	0.89%
SEM	B	0.67%
OPCH	D	0.64%
HIMS	B	0.63%
GH	B	0.61%
ACHC	F	0.6%
CRVL	B	0.54%
AMED	F	0.5%
PINC	B	0.4%
RCM	A	0.38%
PRVA	C	0.37%
NEO	C	0.33%
ASTH	F	0.29%
SGRY	F	0.29%
NHC	C	0.27%
TDOC	C	0.27%
EVH	F	0.23%
USPH	B	0.23%
CLOV	D	0.21%
ALHC	C	0.2%
MD	C	0.2%
PGNY	F	0.19%
CERT	F	0.19%
SDGR	C	0.18%
BKD	F	0.18%
BTSG	C	0.18%
PHR	F	0.17%
LFST	B	0.16%
PNTG	D	0.16%
AMN	F	0.15%
HSTM	B	0.13%
CSTL	D	0.13%
PACS	F	0.11%
OPK	C	0.1%
CYH	F	0.08%
HCAT	D	0.08%
SLP	D	0.08%
AGL	F	0.08%
FLGT	F	0.06%
GDRX	F	0.06%
DCGO	B	0.06%
NRC	F	0.05%
CCRN	F	0.05%
DH	F	0.04%
ACCD	D	0.04%
MODV	C	0.03%

IHF Underweight 34 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FICO	B	-3.79%
CTAS	B	-3.66%
CPRT	B	-3.56%
BLDR	D	-3.43%
FTNT	C	-3.34%
HLI	A	-3.2%
CBZ	B	-2.93%
LPLA	A	-2.87%
CDW	F	-2.86%
VCTR	B	-2.86%
DHI	F	-2.85%
IT	C	-2.83%
MEDP	D	-2.69%
MUSA	B	-2.63%
BAH	F	-2.45%
BLD	D	-2.43%
OMF	A	-2.4%
URI	C	-2.35%
AFG	A	-2.28%
GDDY	A	-2.24%
A	D	-2.12%
CG	B	-2.05%
SCI	B	-2.05%
TPX	B	-1.99%
AME	A	-1.98%
ICFI	F	-1.93%
LNG	A	-1.69%
CHDN	B	-1.57%
ABG	C	-1.55%
ENTG	D	-1.52%
PATK	C	-1.35%
TTEK	F	-1.33%
AX	B	-1.11%
EXPO	D	-0.99%