IHF vs. AMID ETF Comparison
Comparison of iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF) to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID)
IHF
iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF
IHF Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$51.69
Average Daily Volume
102,992
67
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
AMID Description
AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.12
Average Daily Volume
7,060
9
Performance
| Period | IHF | AMID |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.83% | -5.03% |
| 60 Days | -2.03% | -3.31% |
| 90 Days | -1.03% | 4.25% |
| 12 Months | 4.50% | 35.37% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in IHF | Weight in AMID | Overlap |
|---|
IHF Overweight 67 Positions Relative to AMID
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | C | 23.38% | |
| ELV | B | 14.25% | |
| CI | C | 9.7% | |
| HCA | D | 4.38% | |
| CNC | C | 4.3% | |
| CVS | F | 4.16% | |
| HUM | F | 4.07% | |
| VEEV | D | 4.04% | |
| MOH | F | 3.37% | |
| LH | F | 2.91% | |
| DGX | A | 2.61% | |
| THC | A | 1.94% | |
| UHS | C | 1.77% | |
| CHE | F | 1.45% | |
| EHC | A | 1.42% | |
| DVA | B | 1.27% | |
| ACHC | F | 1.16% | |
| HQY | D | 1.15% | |
| ENSG | D | 1.13% | |
| OPCH | F | 0.9% | |
| RDNT | A | 0.54% | |
| EVH | F | 0.54% | |
| DOCS | F | 0.51% | |
| SEM | B | 0.51% | |
| AMED | D | 0.51% | |
| PGNY | F | 0.45% | |
| PINC | F | 0.43% | |
| RCM | D | 0.41% | |
| AMN | D | 0.39% | |
| CRVL | C | 0.37% | |
| GH | D | 0.37% | |
| TDOC | F | 0.36% | |
| PRVA | F | 0.32% | |
| SGRY | F | 0.31% | |
| CERT | D | 0.31% | |
| HIMS | D | 0.31% | |
| NEO | D | 0.3% | |
| AGL | F | 0.28% | |
| ASTH | D | 0.27% | |
| USPH | C | 0.26% | |
| ADUS | C | 0.26% | |
| SDGR | F | 0.23% | |
| BKD | A | 0.22% | |
| NHC | D | 0.21% | |
| PHR | D | 0.19% | |
| SLP | B | 0.12% | |
| MD | D | 0.12% | |
| PNTG | A | 0.11% | |
| LFST | D | 0.1% | |
| CSTL | B | 0.1% | |
| CCRN | F | 0.1% | |
| HSTM | B | 0.1% | |
| ALHC | B | 0.09% | |
| ACCD | F | 0.09% | |
| OPK | C | 0.09% | |
| GDRX | B | 0.09% | |
| NRC | D | 0.08% | |
| CYH | B | 0.07% | |
| FLGT | F | 0.07% | |
| DH | F | 0.06% | |
| AGTI | B | 0.06% | |
| HCAT | F | 0.06% | |
| MODV | D | 0.05% | |
| DCGO | F | 0.05% | |
| CLOV | F | 0.04% | |
| SHCR | F | 0.04% | |
| AMWL | F | 0.02% |
IHF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
AMID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
