HAP vs. EMC ETF Comparison
Comparison of Market Vectors Hard Assets Producers ETF (HAP) to Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC)
HAP
Market Vectors Hard Assets Producers ETF
HAP Description
The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of The Rogersä-Van Eck Hard Assets Producers Index. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in equity securities, which may include depositary receipts, of U.S. and foreign hard asset producer companies. It may concentrate its investments in a particular industry or group of industries to the extent that the Hard Assets Producers Index concentrates in an industry or group of industries. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$50.75
Average Daily Volume
4,479
57
EMC
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF
EMC Description
EMC seeks long-term capital growth through a consumer-focused investment strategy. The fund invests in companies of all sizes that are expected to benefit from both direct and indirect economic effects of increasing consumption activities and purchasing power of emerging market consumers. The adviser believes that emerging markets will experience rapid growth driven by key trends such as population growth, industrialization, wealth accumulation, increasing consumption among youths, and the pursuit of a higher quality of life. Eligible firms must be listed, organized under the laws of, derive at least 50% of their revenue from, or have at least 50% of their assets in emerging markets. Such companies may be of various sectors and from at least three different countries. The portfolio is constructed using a bottom-up approach, subject to a risk management framework. On May 15, 2023, EMC converted from a mutual fund to an actively managed ETF, with $471 million in assets.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.51
Average Daily Volume
27,378
14
Performance
| Period | HAP | EMC |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -2.55% | -4.15% |
| 60 Days | -1.26% | -2.01% |
| 90 Days | -1.25% | -1.79% |
| 12 Months | 8.46% | 9.00% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in HAP | Weight in EMC | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFI | D | 0.47% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
HAP Overweight 56 Positions Relative to EMC
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVX | A | 5.84% | |
| XOM | B | 5.47% | |
| DE | B | 5.05% | |
| NEE | C | 4.34% | |
| BHP | F | 3.72% | |
| CTVA | C | 2.83% | |
| RIO | D | 2.15% | |
| FCX | F | 1.7% | |
| TTE | F | 1.56% | |
| ADM | D | 1.47% | |
| TSN | B | 1.42% | |
| NEM | D | 1.4% | |
| VALE | F | 1.28% | |
| COP | C | 1.16% | |
| CF | A | 1.07% | |
| GOLD | C | 1.07% | |
| NUE | C | 0.96% | |
| INGR | C | 0.87% | |
| BG | D | 0.85% | |
| BP | D | 0.79% | |
| CNH | C | 0.76% | |
| MOS | F | 0.74% | |
| STLD | B | 0.73% | |
| DAR | C | 0.68% | |
| PKX | D | 0.67% | |
| TTC | C | 0.65% | |
| WY | F | 0.65% | |
| WMB | A | 0.61% | |
| FSLR | F | 0.61% | |
| AGCO | D | 0.6% | |
| RS | B | 0.59% | |
| FMC | D | 0.58% | |
| EOG | A | 0.56% | |
| OKE | A | 0.56% | |
| KMI | A | 0.5% | |
| PSX | C | 0.5% | |
| MPC | D | 0.49% | |
| MT | B | 0.49% | |
| LNG | A | 0.49% | |
| SLB | C | 0.49% | |
| FANG | C | 0.43% | |
| E | F | 0.43% | |
| HES | B | 0.43% | |
| VLO | C | 0.42% | |
| SUZ | B | 0.39% | |
| EBR | F | 0.36% | |
| X | B | 0.34% | |
| LPX | B | 0.33% | |
| OXY | D | 0.33% | |
| UFPI | C | 0.32% | |
| WFG | C | 0.29% | |
| WDS | D | 0.29% | |
| EQNR | C | 0.28% | |
| RGLD | C | 0.27% | |
| DVN | F | 0.24% | |
| HAL | C | 0.2% |
HAP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EMC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
