GMF vs. QEMM ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) to SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Mix ETF (QEMM)

GMF

SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF

GMF Description

The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index. The fund employs a sampling strategy in seeking to track the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It generally invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities comprising the index or in ADRs or GDRs based on securities comprising the index. The index is a market capitalization weighted index designed to define and measure the investable universe of publicly traded companies domiciled in emerging Asian Pacific markets. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$116.93

Average Daily Volume

19,271

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QEMM

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Mix ETF

QEMM Description

The investment seeks to track the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Quality Mix Index. The index captures large- and mid-cap representation across 23 emerging markets countries and aims to represent the performance of value, low volatility, and quality factor strategies. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index or in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") or Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on securities comprising the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$59.55

Average Daily Volume

1,920

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	GMF	QEMM
30 Days	-4.97%	-3.65%
60 Days	1.77%	-1.79%
90 Days	3.22%	-1.91%
12 Months	20.04%	11.31%

26 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in GMF	Weight in QEMM	Overlap
ATHM	C	0.03%	0.01%	0.01%
BABA	D	2.29%	0.69%	0.69%
BABA	D	2.29%	0.04%	0.04%
BEKE	D	0.16%	0.02%	0.02%
BGNE	D	0.16%	0.01%	0.01%
BIDU	F	0.35%	0.09%	0.09%
CHT	C	0.19%	0.49%	0.19%
HDB	C	1.59%	0.25%	0.25%
IBN	C	0.0%	0.14%	0.0%
IBN	C	1.22%	0.15%	0.15%
IBN	C	1.22%	0.14%	0.14%
IBN	C	0.0%	0.15%	0.0%
INFY	C	1.08%	1.07%	1.07%
IQ	F	0.01%	0.0%	0.0%
LEGN	D	0.05%	0.05%	0.05%
LI	F	0.18%	0.02%	0.02%
NIO	F	0.09%	0.0%	0.0%
PDD	F	1.1%	1.32%	1.1%
QFIN	A	0.03%	0.12%	0.03%
TCOM	B	0.44%	0.06%	0.06%
TME	D	0.04%	0.02%	0.02%
UMC	F	0.32%	0.1%	0.1%
VIPS	F	0.08%	0.17%	0.08%
WIT	B	0.32%	0.25%	0.25%
XPEV	C	0.1%	0.01%	0.01%
YUMC	C	0.31%	0.09%	0.09%

GMF Overweight 31 Positions Relative to QEMM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TSM	B	9.03%
MMYT	B	0.21%
ZTO	F	0.17%
BILI	D	0.07%
TAL	F	0.07%
YMM	C	0.06%
SIMO	D	0.04%
BZ	F	0.04%
YY	B	0.03%
TIGR	D	0.02%
MOMO	D	0.02%
HIMX	F	0.02%
RLX	C	0.02%
MNSO	D	0.02%
GDS	C	0.02%
NOAH	D	0.01%
QD	B	0.01%
VNET	B	0.01%
WB	D	0.01%
BTBT	C	0.01%
JKS	F	0.01%
SOHU	F	0.01%
DQ	F	0.01%
DADA	F	0.0%
NIU	F	0.0%
API	B	0.0%
CAN	C	0.0%
TUYA	D	0.0%
HUYA	F	0.0%
LX	B	0.0%
GOTU	F	0.0%

GMF Underweight 35 Positions Relative to QEMM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
VALE	F	-1.15%
ABEV	F	-0.28%
BAP	A	-0.25%
SCCO	F	-0.25%
SHG	C	-0.22%
KB	B	-0.21%
SKM	C	-0.18%
RDY	F	-0.17%
PBR	D	-0.16%
ITUB	F	-0.15%
BVN	D	-0.1%
KEP	B	-0.09%
KB	B	-0.09%
PKX	D	-0.08%
KEP	B	-0.06%
GGB	C	-0.05%
SBSW	D	-0.04%
SHG	C	-0.03%
SBS	B	-0.03%
SUZ	B	-0.03%
VALE	F	-0.03%
SID	F	-0.02%
ABEV	F	-0.02%
ASAI	F	-0.02%
UGP	F	-0.02%
CSAN	F	-0.02%
LPL	D	-0.02%
SQM	D	-0.01%
BSAC	C	-0.01%
CIG	C	-0.01%
LPL	D	-0.01%
BCH	C	-0.01%
VIV	F	-0.01%
CIB	B	-0.01%
ENIC	B	-0.0%