FTDS vs. PJP ETF Comparison

Comparison of First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) to PowerShares Dynamic Pharmaceuticals (PJP)
FTDS

First Trust Dividend Strength ETF

FTDS Description

The fund will normally invest at least 90% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in the common stocks and real estate investment companies (?REITs?) that comprise the index. The index is designed to provide exposure to well-capitalized companies with a history of increasing their dividends. The term ?well-capitalized? reflects companies that have strong balance sheets with durable cash flow and a record of profitability.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$48.23

Average Daily Volume

1,835

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PJP

PowerShares Dynamic Pharmaceuticals

PJP Description The PowerShares Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Pharmaceutical IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index is designed to provide capital appreciation by thoroughly evaluating companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 30 US pharmaceuticals companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the research, development, manufacture, sale or distribution of pharmaceuticals and drugs of all types. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$78.99

Average Daily Volume

26,403

Number of Holdings *

22

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FTDS PJP
30 Days -3.38% 0.04%
60 Days 2.31% 1.17%
90 Days 5.85% 3.76%
12 Months 22.16% 3.08%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FTDS Weight in PJP Overlap
FTDS Overweight 50 Positions Relative to PJP
Symbol Grade Weight
MCHP A 2.15%
DGX A 2.09%
BPOP A 2.08%
RLI D 2.07%
SNV C 2.07%
EWBC A 2.07%
RF A 2.06%
DKS B 2.06%
ZION A 2.06%
CFR B 2.05%
SF A 2.04%
SWKS F 2.04%
MTB A 2.03%
RDN B 2.03%
CBSH A 2.03%
EQH A 2.03%
QCOM A 2.02%
WH D 2.02%
CTRA B 2.01%
IPG F 2.0%
PCAR D 2.0%
EOG B 1.99%
GRMN A 1.99%
FANG B 1.99%
SNA D 1.99%
VLO B 1.99%
UNM A 1.98%
PSX D 1.98%
AFL A 1.98%
HII F 1.98%
FMC D 1.98%
G D 1.97%
DINO F 1.97%
JCI B 1.97%
SYY D 1.97%
UNP C 1.96%
AGCO F 1.96%
DVN B 1.96%
HON D 1.96%
CINF D 1.96%
GPC B 1.95%
COP B 1.95%
EMN B 1.94%
PPG D 1.94%
CF F 1.94%
LMT A 1.93%
TGT D 1.92%
ADM C 1.91%
GD A 1.9%
BG B 1.88%
FTDS Underweight 22 Positions Relative to PJP
Symbol Grade Weight
GERN A -7.79%
MRK B -6.04%
AMGN B -5.77%
LLY C -5.77%
REGN C -5.57%
PFE C -5.5%
JNJ D -5.5%
ABBV D -5.44%
ABT D -5.44%
ANIP B -4.12%
UTHR A -4.08%
SUPN C -4.0%
PBH B -3.83%
CORT C -3.8%
PRGO A -3.73%
BIIB D -3.61%
INVA A -3.61%
LGND C -3.57%
GILD F -3.36%
JAZZ F -3.23%
PCRX D -3.2%
AMPH D -2.94%
Compare ETFs