FIVG vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Defiance Next Gen Connectivity ETF (FIVG) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)
FIVG

Defiance Next Gen Connectivity ETF

FIVG Description

The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Bluestar 5G Communications Index (the index). The fund uses a passive management approach to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the index. The index consists of a tiered, modified market capitalization-weighted portfolio of the U.S.-listed equity securities, including depositary receipts, of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of 5G networking and communication technologies. At least 80% of the fund's total assets will be invested in the component securities of the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.29

Average Daily Volume

46,028

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$97.01

Average Daily Volume

11,161

Number of Holdings *

95

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FIVG CZA
30 Days -4.43% -4.13%
60 Days -0.95% 1.37%
90 Days 0.57% 4.67%
12 Months 24.33% 14.76%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FIVG Weight in CZA Overlap
DOX D 1.44% 0.82% 0.82%
FIVG Overweight 48 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
AAPL F 5.37%
AVGO B 5.28%
NVDA B 5.28%
ORCL C 4.56%
AMD C 4.16%
CSCO D 4.13%
QCOM B 4.08%
INTC F 3.35%
ADI A 2.77%
ANET C 2.22%
NXPI B 2.03%
DDOG B 2.0%
DELL A 1.93%
MRVL C 1.84%
KEYS C 1.73%
NTAP A 1.64%
VZ D 1.6%
NOK B 1.58%
HPE A 1.58%
MTSI A 1.56%
SWKS B 1.55%
TMUS B 1.53%
T C 1.51%
QRVO B 1.5%
AKAM D 1.5%
MXL C 1.5%
DT D 1.49%
JNPR D 1.49%
ERIC C 1.48%
FFIV C 1.47%
ARM F 1.47%
CTS B 1.41%
LSCC D 1.4%
CCI F 1.35%
AMT F 1.34%
KD D 1.34%
EQIX F 1.32%
EXTR F 1.32%
IDCC C 1.3%
CRDO C 1.29%
HCP A 1.29%
NTCT D 1.28%
CSGS F 1.28%
COHR C 1.25%
DOCN C 1.22%
CALX F 1.13%
CIEN D 1.1%
VIAV F 1.09%
FIVG Underweight 94 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
HIG D -2.28%
GLW C -2.14%
WTW D -2.11%
WAB A -2.01%
ZBH F -1.99%
DOV A -1.91%
EQR A -1.89%
DTE B -1.75%
STT B -1.74%
ETR A -1.73%
VLTO A -1.72%
ES A -1.67%
WRB D -1.66%
HUBB A -1.65%
BAX C -1.62%
APTV F -1.56%
JBHT F -1.55%
CHKP D -1.53%
MKC A -1.5%
TDY D -1.49%
BAH C -1.46%
CINF B -1.45%
J C -1.44%
WMG D -1.42%
IEX D -1.38%
CSL A -1.37%
LDOS A -1.35%
AVY B -1.35%
LII B -1.27%
SUI D -1.25%
EG D -1.25%
GGG D -1.2%
TRMB C -1.15%
RPM D -1.1%
CAG A -1.1%
LOGI D -1.07%
AMCR D -1.06%
BAP C -1.03%
XP F -1.02%
AOS B -0.99%
ACM A -0.97%
UDR A -0.95%
NI A -0.94%
NVT A -0.93%
GLPI F -0.93%
CNA D -0.93%
RNR D -0.92%
FLEX B -0.89%
HII C -0.87%
PFGC D -0.87%
REG D -0.86%
EMN B -0.85%
RRX C -0.84%
MOS F -0.82%
ITT B -0.8%
REXR F -0.79%
SNX A -0.78%
WEX D -0.77%
QGEN D -0.75%
UNM C -0.75%
ALV B -0.75%
AIZ D -0.72%
ATR B -0.72%
SKX B -0.7%
WWD A -0.69%
SEIC C -0.68%
CACI A -0.65%
GNTX C -0.63%
INGR C -0.56%
ALSN B -0.54%
RHP C -0.53%
IVZ F -0.53%
RRR B -0.49%
VNT C -0.49%
ESAB A -0.48%
G F -0.46%
LFUS D -0.46%
ESI D -0.46%
SON C -0.45%
ESNT C -0.44%
ZWS D -0.43%
KEX A -0.43%
AMG C -0.42%
AXS D -0.41%
UGI A -0.4%
JHG B -0.4%
BLCO D -0.39%
MDU A -0.38%
FLO A -0.38%
CRUS C -0.37%
ACT A -0.36%
FELE B -0.36%
FUL D -0.33%
CPA D -0.31%
Compare ETFs