FFTY vs. HRTS ETF Comparison
Comparison of Innovator IBD 50 Fund ETF (FFTY) to Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF (HRTS)
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 Fund ETF
FFTY Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in companies included in the IBD® 50 Index. It is actively managed. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest in a portfolio of U.S.-listed, exchange-traded equities. FFTY picks 50 leading growth companies that trade on US exchanges, potentially including ADRs. After screening out securities with extreme recent price movements, the universe is ranked by a composite of 11 different fundamental and technical metrics. The top 50 stocks are weighted in tiers, with more weight given to higher-ranking companies. Components of the index are reviewed on a weekly basis. Based on market-wide technical signals, FFTY may substitute half of its equity portfolio with Treasury bills. The index will remain half equity, half T-bills until a reversal signal occurs. Its worth noting that the funds high-turnover strategy could lead to poor tracking and/or taxable capital gains payouts.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.27
Average Daily Volume
72,005
50
HRTS
Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF
HRTS Description
Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in publicly listed companies that derive at least 50% of revenues from products or services related to the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and/or metabolic diseases, as defined by the Centers for Diseases Control and Preventions. The fund advisor generally is expected to consist of more than 15 companies but not more than 100 companies. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$31.85
Average Daily Volume
28,642
9
Performance
| Period | FFTY | HRTS |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -2.87% | -3.51% |
| 60 Days | -6.03% | -8.71% |
| 90 Days | 1.06% | 0.36% |
| 12 Months | 15.97% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in FFTY | Weight in HRTS | Overlap |
|---|
FFTY Overweight 50 Positions Relative to HRTS
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WING | A | 3.76% | |
| EME | A | 3.74% | |
| RCL | A | 3.62% | |
| PRCT | A | 3.58% | |
| FIX | B | 3.56% | |
| TDW | A | 3.52% | |
| OSCR | A | 3.5% | |
| NSSC | B | 3.28% | |
| AAON | A | 3.19% | |
| GCT | B | 3.14% | |
| PWR | A | 3.11% | |
| MMYT | A | 3.07% | |
| ETN | B | 3.04% | |
| LPG | A | 3.01% | |
| DDOG | B | 3.0% | |
| PR | B | 2.95% | |
| CLSK | C | 2.94% | |
| FTAI | A | 2.91% | |
| HUBS | D | 2.82% | |
| ACMR | D | 2.76% | |
| TMDX | A | 2.15% | |
| AXON | B | 2.1% | |
| FCNCA | A | 2.09% | |
| NTRA | A | 2.06% | |
| OWL | B | 2.04% | |
| IBKR | A | 2.02% | |
| ARES | A | 1.99% | |
| NVT | B | 1.98% | |
| AXP | B | 1.98% | |
| HUBB | D | 1.89% | |
| GOOGL | A | 1.04% | |
| GOOG | A | 1.04% | |
| AVAV | A | 1.03% | |
| IR | B | 1.02% | |
| PHM | A | 1.01% | |
| PDD | A | 1.0% | |
| ITCI | B | 1.0% | |
| C | B | 1.0% | |
| NCLH | F | 0.99% | |
| TCOM | A | 0.97% | |
| TXRH | A | 0.52% | |
| NVEI | B | 0.51% | |
| KSPI | B | 0.51% | |
| LMND | B | 0.5% | |
| CTAS | B | 0.5% | |
| BSX | A | 0.5% | |
| POWL | B | 0.49% | |
| DB | B | 0.49% | |
| APO | B | 0.49% | |
| WHD | B | 0.48% |
FFTY: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
HRTS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
