FDRV vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
FDRV

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF

FDRV Description

The fund seeks to provide investment returns that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation Index. Normally investing at least 80% of assets in securities included in the Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation Index and in depositary receipts representing securities included in the index. The Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation Index is designed to reflect the performance of a global universe of companies across the market capitalization spectrum engaged in the production of electric and/or autonomous vehicles and their components, technology, or energy systems or engaged in other initiatives that aim to change the future of transportation.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$13.56

Average Daily Volume

9,416

Number of Holdings *

30

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.20

Average Daily Volume

193,594

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FDRV PGJ
30 Days 0.40% -5.62%
60 Days 2.38% 9.95%
90 Days 1.50% 16.21%
12 Months -12.78% 0.93%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FDRV Weight in PGJ Overlap
LI F 2.69% 2.65% 2.65%
NIO F 1.87% 3.36% 1.87%
XPEV C 1.95% 1.55% 1.55%
FDRV Overweight 27 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
TSLA B 6.03%
UBER D 4.56%
ADI D 4.56%
GRMN B 3.77%
NXPI D 3.77%
RIVN F 3.19%
ON D 3.05%
APTV D 3.04%
SWKS F 2.94%
LEA D 2.21%
ALB C 2.21%
ST F 2.07%
LCID F 1.9%
VC D 1.75%
LYFT C 1.55%
LSCC D 1.54%
ADNT F 1.44%
DIOD D 1.43%
BE B 1.41%
SYNA C 1.29%
SITM B 1.25%
CHPT F 1.18%
PLUG F 1.06%
ALGM D 1.05%
BLBD D 1.01%
LAZR F 0.88%
INDI C 0.72%
FDRV Underweight 51 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC C -9.52%
TCOM B -8.84%
JD D -8.37%
BABA D -7.56%
BIDU F -6.21%
BEKE D -4.54%
NTES D -3.64%
TME D -3.6%
ZTO F -3.39%
VIPS F -3.32%
HTHT D -3.26%
YMM C -3.11%
BZ F -2.57%
QFIN B -2.33%
TAL F -2.25%
GDS C -1.34%
BILI D -1.27%
ATAT C -1.18%
ATHM D -1.06%
DQ F -0.87%
ZLAB C -0.77%
MOMO D -0.68%
RLX C -0.67%
IQ F -0.67%
FINV B -0.65%
MNSO F -0.53%
JKS F -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH F -0.45%
WB D -0.44%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL C -0.34%
VNET B -0.28%
QD C -0.27%
LX C -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH D -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC A -0.19%
RERE B -0.18%
HUYA F -0.17%
API C -0.15%
DAO B -0.11%
DOYU C -0.11%
TUYA F -0.11%
WDH F -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS C -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs