ESPO vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
ESPO

VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF

ESPO Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS® Global Video Gaming & eSports Index (the "index"). The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities that comprise the fund's benchmark index. The index is a global index that tracks the performance of the global video gaming and eSports (also known as electronic sports) segment. The fund may invest in depositary receipts and securities denominated in foreign currencies. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$82.87

Average Daily Volume

15,620

Number of Holdings *

8

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.20

Average Daily Volume

193,594

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period ESPO PGJ
30 Days 13.68% -5.62%
60 Days 12.86% 9.95%
90 Days 16.97% 16.21%
12 Months 50.87% 0.93%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in ESPO Weight in PGJ Overlap
NTES D 6.24% 3.64% 3.64%
ESPO Overweight 7 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
APP B 14.3%
AMD F 6.3%
EA A 5.97%
RBLX C 5.4%
GME C 5.32%
TTWO A 4.7%
U C 4.39%
ESPO Underweight 53 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC C -9.52%
TCOM B -8.84%
JD D -8.37%
BABA D -7.56%
BIDU F -6.21%
BEKE D -4.54%
TME D -3.6%
ZTO F -3.39%
NIO F -3.36%
VIPS F -3.32%
HTHT D -3.26%
YMM C -3.11%
LI F -2.65%
BZ F -2.57%
QFIN B -2.33%
TAL F -2.25%
XPEV C -1.55%
GDS C -1.34%
BILI D -1.27%
ATAT C -1.18%
ATHM D -1.06%
DQ F -0.87%
ZLAB C -0.77%
MOMO D -0.68%
RLX C -0.67%
IQ F -0.67%
FINV B -0.65%
MNSO F -0.53%
JKS F -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH F -0.45%
WB D -0.44%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL C -0.34%
VNET B -0.28%
QD C -0.27%
LX C -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH D -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC A -0.19%
RERE B -0.18%
HUYA F -0.17%
API C -0.15%
DAO B -0.11%
DOYU C -0.11%
TUYA F -0.11%
WDH F -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS C -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs