EBLU vs. PSCT ETF Comparison

Comparison of Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (PSCT)
EBLU

Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund

EBLU Description

The Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund uses a passive management approach and seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and distribution rate performance of the Tortoise Global Water ESG Net Total Return Index®, which is comprised of companies across the globe and throughout the water cycle that we believe are positioned to benefit from the pursuit of solving the water supply/demand imbalance.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.17

Average Daily Volume

2,235

Number of Holdings *

22

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PSCT

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio

PSCT Description The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600® Capped Information Technology Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US information technology companies. These companies are principally engaged in the business of providing information technology-related products and services, including computer hardware and software, Internet, electronics and semiconductors and communication technologies. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$48.78

Average Daily Volume

16,868

Number of Holdings *

63

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EBLU PSCT
30 Days 4.15% 3.26%
60 Days 3.94% 4.32%
90 Days 10.77% 1.41%
12 Months 31.90% 13.16%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EBLU Weight in PSCT Overlap
BMI B 4.12% 4.12% 4.12%
EBLU Overweight 21 Positions Relative to PSCT
Symbol Grade Weight
ANET C 5.99%
ERII D 4.87%
CNM D 4.29%
ECL D 3.94%
FELE B 3.53%
AOS F 3.49%
WMS F 3.42%
AWK C 3.37%
WTRG B 3.32%
FBIN D 3.11%
IEX C 2.92%
LNN B 2.13%
MWA B 1.92%
PNR A 1.51%
WTTR A 1.35%
MEG F 1.3%
TTEK F 0.37%
WTS B 0.33%
VLTO C 0.31%
XYL D 0.27%
ZWS B 0.17%
EBLU Underweight 62 Positions Relative to PSCT
Symbol Grade Weight
SPSC D -4.3%
ACIW B -3.75%
MARA B -3.5%
ITRI C -3.41%
BOX B -3.23%
IDCC B -3.04%
PLXS B -2.79%
SANM B -2.77%
NSIT F -2.76%
AEIS C -2.72%
PI D -2.63%
SITM B -2.46%
DXC B -2.34%
SMTC B -2.26%
ENV B -2.08%
BL B -1.97%
FORM D -1.92%
ALRM C -1.92%
PRGS A -1.86%
AGYS A -1.79%
DV C -1.78%
KLIC B -1.66%
DIOD D -1.64%
OSIS A -1.59%
TTMI C -1.56%
YOU D -1.56%
ACLS F -1.55%
DOCN C -1.51%
VIAV C -1.43%
PLUS F -1.39%
VYX B -1.31%
EXTR C -1.31%
RAMP B -1.23%
ROG D -1.15%
CALX D -1.12%
BHE C -1.11%
CTS C -1.07%
KN B -1.04%
UCTT D -1.04%
NTCT C -1.02%
PLAB C -0.99%
VECO F -0.98%
HLIT D -0.91%
ATEN A -0.79%
COHU C -0.78%
ARLO C -0.74%
SCSC C -0.74%
DGII C -0.74%
MXL C -0.71%
ICHR C -0.67%
XRX F -0.63%
PDFS C -0.61%
CXM C -0.61%
WOLF F -0.58%
CNXN C -0.57%
AOSL C -0.48%
NABL F -0.47%
SWI C -0.46%
CEVA B -0.43%
SEDG F -0.41%
VSAT F -0.4%
CRSR C -0.19%
Compare ETFs