BMVP vs. FITE ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) to SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE)

BMVP

Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF

BMVP Description

The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index seeks to include the 50 securities with the strongest momentum, most muted volatility, most inexpensive valuations, and highest profitability based on an aggregated sector-neutral "MVP" score. Stocks are selected from the top of each sector and size category in a manner designed to produce an index with sector and size dispersion similar to the overall broad market.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.12

Average Daily Volume

1,052

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FITE

SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITE Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Future Security Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Future Security sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$68.36

Average Daily Volume

4,275

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	BMVP	FITE
30 Days	3.31%	9.61%
60 Days	4.53%	12.06%
90 Days	6.66%	12.42%
12 Months	34.01%	36.77%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in BMVP	Weight in FITE	Overlap
GD	F	1.75%	1.1%	1.1%
LDOS	C	1.81%	1.65%	1.65%
LMT	D	1.68%	1.71%	1.68%
RTX	C	1.8%	1.65%	1.65%

BMVP Overweight 49 Positions Relative to FITE

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TRGP	B	2.44%
AMP	A	2.2%
LNG	B	2.17%
FI	A	2.16%
GWW	B	2.09%
ETR	B	2.08%
HON	B	2.04%
EOG	A	2.01%
MSI	B	2.0%
CAH	B	1.98%
ADP	B	1.98%
FOXA	B	1.98%
SPG	B	1.96%
COR	B	1.96%
AXP	A	1.95%
WTW	B	1.95%
BRO	B	1.95%
WMT	A	1.92%
T	A	1.9%
TJX	A	1.88%
COST	B	1.88%
UNH	C	1.86%
HIG	B	1.85%
HD	A	1.85%
PGR	A	1.85%
MCO	B	1.84%
SHW	A	1.83%
MMC	B	1.83%
SSNC	B	1.82%
AAPL	C	1.78%
IRM	D	1.78%
SYY	B	1.77%
EIX	B	1.77%
NTAP	C	1.75%
MMM	D	1.75%
VICI	C	1.75%
KMB	D	1.73%
FE	C	1.72%
OMC	C	1.72%
IBM	C	1.71%
CI	F	1.71%
BAH	F	1.69%
NVR	D	1.69%
AMCR	D	1.66%
BBY	D	1.65%
PHM	D	1.65%
LYB	F	1.59%
ABBV	D	1.54%
ELV	F	1.42%

BMVP Underweight 56 Positions Relative to FITE

Symbol	Grade	Weight
RKLB	B	-6.4%
FTNT	C	-2.26%
S	B	-2.2%
FFIV	B	-2.12%
MOG.A	B	-1.9%
NET	B	-1.88%
OII	B	-1.87%
CYBR	B	-1.87%
CSCO	B	-1.86%
MIR	A	-1.83%
PSN	D	-1.82%
PANW	C	-1.81%
HEI	B	-1.81%
KTOS	B	-1.81%
TDY	B	-1.75%
ATEN	B	-1.73%
VRNS	D	-1.73%
NOC	D	-1.7%
COHR	B	-1.7%
OSIS	B	-1.69%
DDOG	A	-1.68%
NTCT	C	-1.68%
CHKP	D	-1.65%
LHX	C	-1.64%
AVGO	D	-1.61%
OSPN	A	-1.59%
RPD	C	-1.57%
ZS	C	-1.57%
RDWR	B	-1.55%
QLYS	C	-1.54%
IRDM	D	-1.5%
ZD	C	-1.49%
MRCY	B	-1.49%
JNPR	F	-1.48%
ERJ	B	-1.47%
AKAM	D	-1.46%
TENB	C	-1.44%
AVAV	D	-1.35%
SANM	B	-1.33%
CRWD	B	-1.33%
HXL	D	-1.33%
CACI	D	-1.23%
OKTA	C	-1.22%
DCO	C	-1.2%
BRKR	D	-1.19%
APH	A	-1.19%
BA	F	-1.18%
VREX	C	-1.15%
TXT	D	-1.1%
KBR	F	-1.04%
NABL	F	-1.03%
HII	D	-0.91%
PL	A	-0.9%
MVIS	F	-0.85%
VSAT	F	-0.72%
MASS	F	-0.13%