AMID vs. LCLG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG)
AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.03

Average Daily Volume

7,912

Number of Holdings *

37

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
LCLG

Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF

LCLG Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests primarily in securities of companies that use innovative technologies or ideas to gain advantage over competitors. The Advisor expects to invest principally in large capitalization equity securities that are traded on U.S. securities exchanges. The fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities of foreign issuers, including issuers in emerging markets.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$53.64

Average Daily Volume

562

Number of Holdings *

57

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period AMID LCLG
30 Days 5.95% 8.70%
60 Days 4.28% 10.68%
90 Days 5.77% 12.18%
12 Months 35.20% 42.48%
6 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in AMID Weight in LCLG Overlap
A D 2.12% 0.82% 0.82%
CPRT A 3.56% 1.62% 1.62%
CTAS B 3.66% 2.83% 2.83%
LPLA A 2.87% 0.87% 0.87%
OMF A 2.4% 0.35% 0.35%
URI B 2.35% 2.58% 2.35%
AMID Overweight 31 Positions Relative to LCLG
Symbol Grade Weight
FICO B 3.79%
BLDR D 3.43%
FTNT C 3.34%
HLI B 3.2%
CBZ B 2.93%
CDW F 2.86%
VCTR B 2.86%
DHI D 2.85%
IT C 2.83%
MEDP D 2.69%
MUSA A 2.63%
HCA F 2.49%
BAH F 2.45%
BLD D 2.43%
AFG A 2.28%
GDDY A 2.24%
ADUS D 2.09%
CG A 2.05%
SCI B 2.05%
TPX B 1.99%
AME A 1.98%
ICFI F 1.93%
LNG B 1.69%
CHDN B 1.57%
ABG B 1.55%
ENTG D 1.52%
MOH F 1.44%
PATK D 1.35%
TTEK F 1.33%
AX A 1.11%
EXPO D 0.99%
AMID Underweight 51 Positions Relative to LCLG
Symbol Grade Weight
APP B -5.16%
NFLX A -5.14%
AAPL C -4.63%
MA C -4.62%
AMZN C -4.3%
APH A -4.28%
AVGO D -3.99%
META D -3.86%
KLAC D -3.65%
DKS C -3.01%
GOOGL C -2.56%
FAST B -2.32%
ODFL B -2.16%
DECK A -1.86%
GOOG C -1.8%
TTD B -1.78%
COIN C -1.78%
LAD A -1.76%
BURL A -1.75%
ANET C -1.69%
WSM B -1.65%
SHW A -1.58%
MTD D -1.58%
TXRH C -1.54%
LECO B -1.46%
EA A -1.32%
WAT B -1.29%
SBUX A -1.28%
ZBRA B -1.2%
ADBE C -1.1%
ACN C -1.07%
MAR B -0.98%
NDSN B -0.96%
HD A -0.93%
GPK C -0.9%
MNST C -0.87%
PAYC B -0.84%
HUBB B -0.8%
IQV D -0.69%
LOGI D -0.68%
LULU C -0.66%
ZTS D -0.59%
TRMB B -0.58%
ELF C -0.56%
ETN A -0.53%
POOL C -0.45%
CRL C -0.41%
NSP D -0.4%
LW C -0.38%
RH B -0.36%
IPGP D -0.25%
Compare ETFs