AMID vs. BUYZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ)
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
AMID Description
AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$31.92
Average Daily Volume
7,058
9
BUYZ
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
BUYZ Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies that are relevant to its investment theme of disruptive commerce. The fund invests predominantly in common stock. Although it may invest across economic sectors, the fund concentrates its investments in consumer discretionary related industries. It is non-diversified. Seeks capital appreciation by investing in innovative companies benefitting from transformation in the e-commerce space. Provides access to companies that are related to new online markets, streamlined procurement systems, and game-changing ways to deliver goods and servicesGrade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.42
Average Daily Volume
3,886
43
Performance
| Period | AMID | BUYZ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -5.14% | -5.03% |
| 60 Days | -3.77% | -4.83% |
| 90 Days | 3.60% | -0.98% |
| 12 Months | 34.53% | 29.51% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in AMID | Weight in BUYZ | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPRT | D | 3.81% | 3.78% | 3.78% |
AMID Underweight 42 Positions Relative to BUYZ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | B | -10.04% | |
| UBER | D | -7.23% | |
| SHOP | C | -6.48% | |
| DASH | D | -5.74% | |
| COST | B | -5.33% | |
| GWW | D | -5.17% | |
| FAST | C | -4.21% | |
| BKNG | D | -3.83% | |
| MELI | B | -3.81% | |
| MA | D | -3.5% | |
| V | D | -3.23% | |
| MANH | F | -2.84% | |
| PDD | A | -2.66% | |
| ABNB | D | -2.34% | |
| META | D | -2.21% | |
| NFLX | C | -2.06% | |
| MMYT | A | -1.7% | |
| XPO | D | -1.38% | |
| ODFL | F | -1.32% | |
| GLBE | F | -1.18% | |
| PLD | D | -1.1% | |
| ETSY | F | -1.0% | |
| PKG | C | -0.98% | |
| GOOGL | A | -0.97% | |
| FRPT | C | -0.88% | |
| EXPE | A | -0.86% | |
| ADSK | F | -0.83% | |
| EBAY | B | -0.83% | |
| BABA | B | -0.73% | |
| JKHY | D | -0.71% | |
| RBLX | C | -0.7% | |
| SPSC | B | -0.69% | |
| TTD | B | -0.6% | |
| SQ | D | -0.54% | |
| GPK | D | -0.27% | |
| PYPL | A | -0.25% | |
| APP | A | -0.24% | |
| CSGP | C | -0.24% | |
| DLO | F | -0.23% | |
| TRU | C | -0.22% | |
| SPT | F | -0.15% | |
| U | F | -0.14% |
AMID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
BUYZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
