XMHQ vs. PRN ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) to PowerShares Dynamic Industrials (PRN)

XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400Â® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400Â® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$105.30

Average Daily Volume

310,805

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PRN

PowerShares Dynamic Industrials

PRN Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Industrials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Industrials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 60 US industrial companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of providing industrial products and services, including engineering heavy machinery, construction, electrical equipment, aerospace and defense and general manufacturing. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$175.23

Average Daily Volume

18,897

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XMHQ	PRN
30 Days	3.12%	9.86%
60 Days	3.51%	16.00%
90 Days	3.55%	21.81%
12 Months	28.09%	62.90%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XMHQ	Weight in PRN	Overlap
AIT	B	1.4%	1.78%	1.4%
CSL	C	3.86%	2.43%	2.43%
EXP	B	1.45%	2.01%	1.45%
FIX	A	2.48%	4.0%	2.48%
UFPI	C	1.21%	1.4%	1.21%

XMHQ Overweight 71 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MANH	D	4.08%
EME	A	3.81%
WSM	C	3.43%
THC	D	2.39%
RS	B	2.38%
RNR	C	2.28%
OC	A	2.16%
LECO	C	2.08%
GGG	B	2.05%
TOL	B	2.03%
PSTG	D	1.86%
CW	C	1.83%
KNSL	B	1.8%
DT	D	1.66%
MEDP	D	1.62%
BLD	D	1.59%
DKS	D	1.57%
CR	A	1.44%
MUSA	B	1.43%
AYI	B	1.43%
CVLT	B	1.38%
PRI	B	1.35%
WMS	F	1.34%
INGR	C	1.32%
AFG	A	1.3%
RGLD	C	1.3%
CHE	D	1.3%
TREX	C	1.3%
SEIC	B	1.28%
PCTY	C	1.22%
CNM	D	1.2%
CELH	F	1.13%
LSTR	D	1.13%
DCI	B	1.12%
RLI	A	1.1%
LSCC	D	1.09%
SAIC	F	1.03%
CROX	D	1.02%
SSD	F	1.01%
WFRD	D	0.96%
QLYS	B	0.94%
LNTH	D	0.94%
G	B	0.94%
ELF	C	0.93%
VNT	C	0.91%
COKE	C	0.9%
ROIV	C	0.9%
CHX	C	0.88%
DINO	D	0.87%
KBH	D	0.85%
MSA	F	0.84%
CBT	D	0.82%
MTG	C	0.81%
VVV	D	0.8%
ESNT	F	0.74%
EXPO	D	0.74%
CRUS	D	0.66%
MSM	C	0.66%
LOPE	C	0.64%
NEU	D	0.6%
LANC	C	0.52%
FHI	B	0.51%
IBOC	B	0.49%
ENS	F	0.49%
TEX	F	0.48%
SAM	C	0.48%
YETI	D	0.48%
NSP	F	0.47%
VC	F	0.39%
CXT	C	0.35%
CRI	F	0.32%

XMHQ Underweight 35 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SMR	B	-5.12%
PWR	A	-3.83%
WSO	A	-3.68%
GWW	B	-3.68%
HEI	A	-3.58%
PH	A	-3.52%
AXON	A	-3.45%
TT	A	-3.33%
CTAS	B	-3.17%
HWM	A	-3.08%
URI	C	-3.08%
PKG	A	-2.88%
STRL	A	-2.85%
FI	A	-2.85%
IRM	C	-2.41%
TDG	D	-2.31%
CSWI	B	-2.25%
DY	D	-2.16%
RSG	A	-2.04%
GE	D	-2.0%
CARR	C	-1.98%
MLI	B	-1.96%
GVA	A	-1.94%
BAH	F	-1.83%
LMB	B	-1.81%
ROAD	B	-1.71%
KAI	B	-1.63%
CLH	C	-1.5%
TTEK	F	-1.49%
ITT	A	-1.45%
TPC	C	-1.45%
VSEC	C	-1.44%
CECO	B	-1.33%
RUSHA	C	-1.32%
FWRD	D	-1.31%