TDV vs. SMIG ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) to AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG)

TDV

ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF

TDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, targets companies from the U.S. technology sector and select U.S. technology-related companies from the communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$78.25

Average Daily Volume

12,384

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SMIG

AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF

SMIG Description

ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is an exchange traded fund launched by ETF Series Solutions. The fund is co-managed by Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Bahl & Gaynor, Inc. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization, within the market capitalization range of the Russell 2500 Index. The fund invests in dividend paying stocks of companies. It employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.90

Average Daily Volume

115,219

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TDV	SMIG
30 Days	2.41%	8.28%
60 Days	1.18%	9.60%
90 Days	3.62%	11.75%
12 Months	21.33%	37.99%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in TDV	Weight in SMIG	Overlap
AVT	C	2.82%	1.88%	1.88%
BR	A	3.0%	4.17%	3.0%
CSGS	B	3.26%	0.35%	0.35%

TDV Overweight 31 Positions Relative to SMIG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DLB	B	3.23%
ORCL	C	3.14%
BMI	B	3.14%
V	A	3.11%
INTU	C	3.08%
CASS	B	3.07%
APH	B	3.06%
MSI	C	3.02%
TXN	D	2.95%
CSCO	A	2.93%
HPQ	B	2.92%
GLW	B	2.89%
MA	B	2.88%
ROP	B	2.87%
CGNX	C	2.87%
POWI	D	2.83%
SSNC	A	2.81%
AAPL	B	2.8%
MSFT	D	2.8%
LRCX	F	2.77%
ACN	B	2.77%
ADI	D	2.71%
LFUS	D	2.7%
JKHY	D	2.69%
IBM	C	2.67%
KLAC	F	2.65%
AVGO	D	2.63%
QCOM	F	2.57%
SWKS	F	2.52%
MCHP	F	2.49%
CDW	F	2.34%

TDV Underweight 41 Positions Relative to SMIG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
VCTR	B	-5.4%
TRGP	B	-5.19%
HUBB	B	-4.23%
PKG	B	-4.23%
SNA	A	-4.2%
BAH	F	-3.91%
WSO	A	-3.88%
HIG	B	-3.88%
EVR	B	-3.77%
NI	A	-3.46%
DGX	B	-3.16%
PRGO	C	-3.12%
ADC	B	-2.73%
DOX	D	-2.54%
IPAR	B	-2.53%
AFG	A	-2.41%
AVY	D	-2.38%
TXRH	A	-2.28%
ATO	A	-2.0%
RPM	A	-1.96%
LNT	A	-1.93%
HOMB	B	-1.84%
NTAP	C	-1.82%
LANC	C	-1.81%
TRNO	D	-1.67%
CBOE	B	-1.51%
AVNT	B	-1.49%
USPH	C	-1.47%
CMS	C	-1.2%
PAGP	B	-1.1%
ELS	C	-1.07%
PAG	B	-0.99%
CAG	D	-0.93%
FFBC	B	-0.92%
MTH	C	-0.88%
DTM	B	-0.84%
SON	D	-0.66%
NXST	C	-0.66%
NSP	F	-0.6%
TSCO	C	-0.46%
WKC	D	-0.33%