QVAL vs. SMOG ETF Comparison
Comparison of ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) to VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG)
QVAL
ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
QVAL Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$43.16
Average Daily Volume
23,579
49
SMOG
VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF
SMOG Description
The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Ardour Global IndexSM (Extra Liquid). The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in stocks of low carbon energy companies. Such companies may include small- and medium-capitalization companies and foreign issuers. "Low carbon energy companies" refers to companies primarily engaged in alternative energy, including renewable energy, alternative fuels and related enabling technologies (such as advanced batteries). It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$99.84
Average Daily Volume
2,825
29
Performance
Period | QVAL | SMOG |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -3.68% | 3.77% |
60 Days | 3.00% | 4.08% |
90 Days | 6.31% | 5.33% |
12 Months | 39.09% | -10.80% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in QVAL | Weight in SMOG | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OC | A | 2.0% | 2.95% | 2.0% |
QVAL Overweight 48 Positions Relative to SMOG
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
UTHR | A | 2.2% | |
THC | A | 2.13% | |
KBH | B | 2.03% | |
BG | C | 2.02% | |
CMCSA | F | 2.02% | |
TEX | D | 2.02% | |
T | C | 2.02% | |
MO | A | 2.02% | |
UHS | C | 2.02% | |
SNA | D | 2.01% | |
TOL | C | 2.01% | |
IPG | F | 2.01% | |
CRI | F | 2.01% | |
MTCH | D | 2.01% | |
CSCO | F | 2.01% | |
ELV | B | 2.01% | |
INSW | A | 2.01% | |
GPK | C | 2.01% | |
OMC | B | 2.01% | |
PVH | D | 2.01% | |
ULTA | F | 2.01% | |
ALSN | D | 2.01% | |
MOH | F | 2.01% | |
TMHC | C | 2.0% | |
UFPI | C | 2.0% | |
AMR | D | 1.99% | |
ATKR | B | 1.99% | |
HPQ | D | 1.99% | |
AGCO | F | 1.98% | |
ARW | B | 1.98% | |
ANF | C | 1.98% | |
LEA | F | 1.98% | |
DINO | F | 1.98% | |
ARCH | D | 1.97% | |
CROX | D | 1.97% | |
BBY | D | 1.96% | |
SIG | C | 1.95% | |
JBL | F | 1.95% | |
PBF | C | 1.95% | |
VLO | C | 1.95% | |
SM | B | 1.94% | |
CRC | F | 1.94% | |
CEIX | F | 1.94% | |
WFRD | B | 1.93% | |
APA | F | 1.93% | |
HAL | F | 1.93% | |
LBRT | B | 1.89% | |
CVI | F | 1.88% |
QVAL Underweight 28 Positions Relative to SMOG
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
NEE | B | -9.73% | |
TSLA | D | -7.81% | |
LI | F | -3.72% | |
FSLR | B | -3.45% | |
ENPH | F | -3.06% | |
RIVN | F | -1.49% | |
NIO | D | -1.4% | |
XPEV | D | -1.34% | |
IBP | C | -1.09% | |
EBR | D | -1.08% | |
BMI | A | -0.91% | |
ENS | D | -0.73% | |
SEDG | F | -0.72% | |
CIG | A | -0.71% | |
ORA | C | -0.64% | |
LCID | D | -0.58% | |
HASI | C | -0.48% | |
QS | F | -0.47% | |
ELP | D | -0.43% | |
TAC | C | -0.4% | |
BE | C | -0.39% | |
DQ | F | -0.37% | |
AY | B | -0.35% | |
RUN | D | -0.34% | |
ARRY | D | -0.34% | |
PLUG | F | -0.32% | |
JKS | D | -0.2% | |
CSIQ | F | -0.16% |
QVAL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
SMOG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords