QLTY vs. FLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) to American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV)
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.45

Average Daily Volume

265,587

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
FLV

American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF

FLV Description The investment seeks long-term capital growth. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of large capitalization companies. The portfolio managers may sell stocks from the fund's portfolio if they believe a stock no longer meets their valuation criteria, a stock's risk parameters outweigh its return opportunity, more attractive alternatives are identified or specific events alter a stock's prospects.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$71.10

Average Daily Volume

6,138

Number of Holdings *

39

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period QLTY FLV
30 Days 0.40% 0.77%
60 Days 0.12% 1.71%
90 Days 2.04% 3.83%
12 Months 26.17% 20.43%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in QLTY Weight in FLV Overlap
DGX A 1.35% 1.03% 1.03%
JNJ C 4.24% 7.21% 4.24%
MDLZ F 1.72% 1.83% 1.72%
UNH B 3.62% 2.28% 2.28%
QLTY Overweight 30 Positions Relative to FLV
Symbol Grade Weight
MSFT D 6.46%
AAPL C 5.33%
ORCL A 4.71%
META D 4.5%
GOOGL C 4.43%
ABT B 4.17%
TXN C 3.53%
ACN B 3.3%
V A 3.22%
PG C 3.2%
ISRG A 2.92%
KLAC F 2.85%
LRCX F 2.85%
CRM B 2.84%
KO D 2.81%
HLT A 2.62%
ARMK B 2.56%
ELV F 2.5%
WFC A 2.45%
AVGO D 2.45%
MRK D 2.41%
AMZN C 2.4%
USB A 2.31%
OTIS C 2.25%
TJX A 2.14%
GE D 1.73%
LLY F 1.61%
STZ D 1.59%
CI D 1.49%
TMO F 0.91%
QLTY Underweight 35 Positions Relative to FLV
Symbol Grade Weight
UL D -4.05%
MDT D -3.91%
DUK C -3.81%
ZBH C -3.78%
UPS C -3.57%
NSC B -3.55%
JPM A -3.04%
ADI D -3.03%
TFC A -3.01%
OKE A -2.9%
XOM B -2.85%
BLK B -2.69%
BRK.A B -2.54%
ATO A -2.47%
GIS D -2.27%
CSCO B -2.19%
HSIC C -2.14%
BDX F -2.07%
SCHW B -2.03%
AMT C -2.01%
BK A -1.98%
RGA A -1.92%
KVUE A -1.86%
ALL A -1.85%
BUD F -1.85%
VZ C -1.83%
CAG F -1.81%
FFIV B -1.74%
KMB C -1.7%
GPK C -1.55%
ROK C -1.51%
SNY F -1.5%
RTX D -1.49%
MMC B -1.25%
TTE F -0.94%
Compare ETFs