QLTY vs. CGUS ETF Comparison

Comparison of GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) to Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS)
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.53

Average Daily Volume

265,453

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CGUS

Capital Group Core Equity ETF

CGUS Description Capital Group Core Equity ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Capital Research and Management Company. The fund invests in public equity markets. It invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. The fund invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. It employs fundamental analysis to create its portfolio. Capital Group Core Equity ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.05

Average Daily Volume

564,593

Number of Holdings *

81

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period QLTY CGUS
30 Days 1.40% 1.71%
60 Days 0.46% 2.77%
90 Days 2.30% 4.79%
12 Months 26.48% 30.95%
19 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in QLTY Weight in CGUS Overlap
AAPL C 5.33% 4.97% 4.97%
ABT B 4.17% 1.03% 1.03%
ACN C 3.3% 1.85% 1.85%
AMZN C 2.4% 3.86% 2.4%
AVGO D 2.45% 3.59% 2.45%
CRM B 2.84% 0.97% 0.97%
GE D 1.73% 1.29% 1.29%
GOOGL C 4.43% 2.79% 2.79%
LLY F 1.61% 1.59% 1.59%
MDLZ F 1.72% 0.38% 0.38%
META D 4.5% 5.37% 4.5%
MSFT F 6.46% 6.35% 6.35%
ORCL B 4.71% 0.58% 0.58%
STZ D 1.59% 0.41% 0.41%
TMO F 0.91% 0.96% 0.91%
TXN C 3.53% 1.39% 1.39%
UNH C 3.62% 3.2% 3.2%
V A 3.22% 0.63% 0.63%
WFC A 2.45% 0.4% 0.4%
QLTY Overweight 15 Positions Relative to CGUS
Symbol Grade Weight
JNJ D 4.24%
PG A 3.2%
ISRG A 2.92%
KLAC D 2.85%
LRCX F 2.85%
KO D 2.81%
HLT A 2.62%
ARMK B 2.56%
ELV F 2.5%
MRK F 2.41%
USB A 2.31%
OTIS C 2.25%
TJX A 2.14%
CI F 1.49%
DGX A 1.35%
QLTY Underweight 62 Positions Relative to CGUS
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA C -2.47%
RTX C -2.06%
GOOG C -1.81%
ABBV D -1.78%
MA C -1.67%
JPM A -1.6%
FIS C -1.52%
ADP B -1.49%
GEHC F -1.43%
APD A -1.34%
WH B -1.17%
CARR D -1.15%
BKR B -1.11%
BLK C -1.1%
VRTX F -1.01%
BA F -0.99%
PCG A -0.97%
VICI C -0.91%
RCL A -0.87%
PNC B -0.86%
COF B -0.84%
SPGI C -0.84%
DHR F -0.84%
EQIX A -0.82%
RVTY F -0.79%
TSLA B -0.75%
URI B -0.75%
PM B -0.74%
GD F -0.73%
NFLX A -0.73%
IR B -0.71%
HD A -0.68%
HON B -0.64%
XOM B -0.61%
WWD B -0.6%
EIX B -0.56%
MMC B -0.55%
BRK.A B -0.53%
CNP B -0.52%
CE F -0.52%
LIN D -0.51%
FCX D -0.5%
CVX A -0.49%
CMCSA B -0.48%
XPO B -0.47%
GIS D -0.46%
EMN D -0.46%
CB C -0.45%
MS A -0.44%
TDG D -0.42%
TSM B -0.4%
SRE A -0.39%
TPR B -0.37%
CHDN B -0.37%
NOW A -0.35%
WELL A -0.35%
STT A -0.34%
AJG B -0.33%
NKE D -0.31%
UNP C -0.31%
STX D -0.28%
PANW C -0.24%
Compare ETFs