QLTY vs. BLCN ETF Comparison

Comparison of GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) to Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN)
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.77

Average Daily Volume

266,232

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BLCN

Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF

BLCN Description The investment seeks long-term growth by tracking the investment returns, before fees and expenses, of the Siren Nasdaq Blockchain Economy Index. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's assets, will be invested in component securities of the index. The index is designed to measure the returns of companies that are committing material resources to developing, researching, supporting, innovating or utilizing blockchain technology for their proprietary use or for use by others (Blockchain Companies). The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.71

Average Daily Volume

19,410

Number of Holdings *

39

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period QLTY BLCN
30 Days 2.25% 10.89%
60 Days 0.46% 11.58%
90 Days 3.21% 14.25%
12 Months 27.36% 37.87%
6 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in QLTY Weight in BLCN Overlap
ACN B 3.3% 3.56% 3.3%
META D 4.5% 3.27% 3.27%
MSFT D 6.46% 3.43% 3.43%
ORCL C 4.71% 1.77% 1.77%
TXN D 3.53% 0.85% 0.85%
V A 3.22% 0.92% 0.92%
QLTY Overweight 28 Positions Relative to BLCN
Symbol Grade Weight
AAPL B 5.33%
GOOGL C 4.43%
JNJ D 4.24%
ABT B 4.17%
UNH B 3.62%
PG A 3.2%
ISRG C 2.92%
KLAC F 2.85%
LRCX F 2.85%
CRM B 2.84%
KO D 2.81%
HLT A 2.62%
ARMK A 2.56%
ELV F 2.5%
WFC A 2.45%
AVGO D 2.45%
MRK F 2.41%
AMZN C 2.4%
USB A 2.31%
OTIS C 2.25%
TJX A 2.14%
GE D 1.73%
MDLZ F 1.72%
LLY F 1.61%
STZ D 1.59%
CI D 1.49%
DGX B 1.35%
TMO F 0.91%
QLTY Underweight 33 Positions Relative to BLCN
Symbol Grade Weight
MSTR C -5.43%
HOOD B -5.19%
RIOT C -4.81%
MARA C -4.63%
WMT B -4.57%
CLSK C -4.54%
COIN B -4.49%
CUBI C -4.28%
NVDA C -4.09%
MA B -4.0%
PYPL A -2.69%
SQ B -2.65%
AMD F -2.4%
QCOM F -1.7%
MU D -1.68%
AXP A -1.2%
HPE B -1.15%
JPM B -1.08%
NU D -1.03%
SAP B -0.92%
NDAQ A -0.91%
CSCO A -0.9%
BLK C -0.88%
WT B -0.86%
TSM C -0.81%
INFY B -0.77%
IBM C -0.75%
ICE D -0.67%
BK A -0.61%
GS B -0.61%
BABA D -0.38%
BIDU F -0.34%
JD D -0.26%
Compare ETFs