PID vs. PVAL ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Intl Dividend Achievers (PID) to Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL)
PID
PowerShares Intl Dividend Achievers
PID Description
The PowerShares International Dividend Achievers™ Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ International Dividend AchieversTM Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in dividend paying common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to identify an international group of American Depository Receipts, Global Depositary Receipts and non-U.S. common or ordinary stocks that have qualified as International Dividend Achievers™. These companies have increased their annual dividend for five or more consecutive fiscal years. The Fund and the Index are reconstituted annually in January and rebalanced quarterly in January, April, July and October. Effective December 28, 2012, the NADAQ OMX Group, Inc., replaced Mergent, Inc., as the Index Provider of the Index. Effective February 25, 2013, the name of the Index changed from International Dividend Achievers Index to NASDAQ International Dividend Achievers Index. There will be no change to the methodology by which NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., the Index Provider, calculates the Index. Please see the Fund’s prospectus supplement for more information. On February 25, 2013, NASDAQ took the place of the NYSE as the official Index data source.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$18.18
Average Daily Volume
150,314
24
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
PVAL Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that closely correspond, before expenses, to the performance of the Nasdaq U.S. Contrarian Value Index (the index). Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in equity securities of companies that compose the index at the time of purchase. The index uses a quantitative model designed to identify equity securities in the Nasdaq US Large Mid Cap Index (the parent index) that appear to be undervalued by the market relative to their fundamental value.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$35.10
Average Daily Volume
171,580
44
Performance
| Period | PID | PVAL |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.60% | -1.57% |
| 60 Days | 0.68% | 3.80% |
| 90 Days | 1.07% | 8.79% |
| 12 Months | 5.04% | 32.68% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in PID | Weight in PVAL | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNY | C | 3.01% | 2.27% | 2.27% |
PID Overweight 23 Positions Relative to PVAL
PID Underweight 43 Positions Relative to PVAL
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | B | -4.03% | |
| BAC | B | -3.43% | |
| ORCL | D | -3.4% | |
| URI | D | -3.26% | |
| APO | D | -3.22% | |
| MSFT | C | -3.17% | |
| REGN | B | -2.9% | |
| COP | C | -2.87% | |
| C | A | -2.86% | |
| CI | C | -2.73% | |
| NRG | A | -2.65% | |
| TMO | C | -2.63% | |
| HLT | D | -2.57% | |
| GS | A | -2.52% | |
| MCK | C | -2.43% | |
| AIG | A | -2.38% | |
| PHM | A | -2.36% | |
| FCX | A | -2.34% | |
| NXPI | A | -2.24% | |
| CEG | A | -2.23% | |
| FDX | C | -2.18% | |
| JCI | C | -2.16% | |
| GLPI | F | -2.15% | |
| IR | D | -2.14% | |
| KO | A | -2.03% | |
| PG | A | -1.95% | |
| WMT | C | -1.9% | |
| SCHW | A | -1.85% | |
| GM | B | -1.84% | |
| VLO | C | -1.8% | |
| QCOM | A | -1.78% | |
| ORLY | D | -1.7% | |
| BJ | C | -1.59% | |
| EXC | C | -1.53% | |
| NOC | B | -1.44% | |
| BALL | A | -1.42% | |
| CTVA | A | -1.39% | |
| EMN | A | -1.36% | |
| LUV | F | -1.36% | |
| TMUS | A | -1.23% | |
| CHTR | F | -0.88% | |
| AMT | D | -0.6% | |
| COF | B | -0.19% |
PID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PVAL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
