PGJ vs. ZIG ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to The Acquirers Fund (ZIG)
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$24.95
Average Daily Volume
188,179
54
ZIG
The Acquirers Fund
ZIG Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$41.62
Average Daily Volume
3,204
30
Performance
Period | PGJ | ZIG |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -7.35% | 4.47% |
60 Days | 14.90% | 9.97% |
90 Days | 13.35% | 11.29% |
12 Months | -1.37% | 31.80% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in PGJ | Weight in ZIG | Overlap |
---|
PGJ Overweight 54 Positions Relative to ZIG
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
YUMC | C | 9.25% | |
TCOM | C | 9.12% | |
JD | C | 8.94% | |
BABA | D | 7.44% | |
BIDU | F | 6.19% | |
BEKE | C | 4.86% | |
TME | F | 3.57% | |
NIO | F | 3.5% | |
ZTO | F | 3.39% | |
VIPS | F | 3.21% | |
NTES | C | 3.19% | |
HTHT | C | 3.11% | |
YMM | C | 3.05% | |
LI | F | 2.72% | |
BZ | F | 2.6% | |
TAL | D | 2.52% | |
QFIN | C | 2.37% | |
XPEV | C | 1.39% | |
BILI | C | 1.39% | |
GDS | C | 1.18% | |
ATAT | C | 1.1% | |
ATHM | D | 1.01% | |
DQ | C | 0.84% | |
ZLAB | C | 0.8% | |
IQ | F | 0.7% | |
FINV | C | 0.65% | |
MOMO | C | 0.64% | |
RLX | D | 0.6% | |
MNSO | D | 0.53% | |
JKS | D | 0.5% | |
TIGR | C | 0.48% | |
CSIQ | F | 0.46% | |
WB | F | 0.45% | |
EH | C | 0.44% | |
DDL | B | 0.33% | |
LX | C | 0.27% | |
SOHU | F | 0.26% | |
GOTU | F | 0.25% | |
VNET | D | 0.25% | |
QD | C | 0.25% | |
NOAH | C | 0.24% | |
HUYA | F | 0.17% | |
RERE | D | 0.17% | |
KC | B | 0.14% | |
API | B | 0.1% | |
DAO | C | 0.1% | |
TUYA | D | 0.1% | |
DOYU | C | 0.1% | |
DADA | D | 0.1% | |
WDH | D | 0.09% | |
BZUN | F | 0.07% | |
CAAS | C | 0.07% | |
NIU | F | 0.06% | |
CBAT | F | 0.05% |
PGJ Underweight 30 Positions Relative to ZIG
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
TPL | B | -4.23% | |
UI | B | -4.06% | |
HCC | C | -3.89% | |
CALM | B | -3.82% | |
MLI | B | -3.71% | |
STLD | C | -3.69% | |
BTU | C | -3.64% | |
SYF | B | -3.55% | |
MO | A | -3.51% | |
APAM | B | -3.43% | |
CF | B | -3.42% | |
DPZ | C | -3.41% | |
BK | B | -3.4% | |
YUM | B | -3.37% | |
CNS | C | -3.36% | |
DDS | B | -3.35% | |
ATKR | C | -3.31% | |
AMR | C | -3.3% | |
CRC | B | -3.26% | |
VRSN | C | -3.22% | |
NUE | D | -3.21% | |
SLM | A | -3.18% | |
LPX | A | -3.13% | |
BCC | B | -3.1% | |
PBF | F | -2.9% | |
BPOP | C | -2.89% | |
BLDR | C | -2.84% | |
STNG | F | -2.77% | |
CROX | F | -2.51% | |
TRMD | F | -2.37% |
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
ZIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords