PGJ vs. UTES ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES)

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.79

Average Daily Volume

62,052

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

UTES

Reaves Utilities ETF

UTES Description

ETFis Series Trust I - Reaves Utilities ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Virtus ETF Advisers LLC. The fund is co-managed by W. H. Reaves & Co., Inc. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating in the utilities sector. It invests in dividend yielding stocks of companies across all market capitalization. The fund employs fundamental analysis with a bottom-up stock picking approach with a focus on factors such as conservative capital structures, solid balance sheets, history of and/or potential for growing earnings and raising dividends, lower-than-market levels of volatility, correlation or similar characteristics earnings and cash flow potential, dividend prospects and tax treatment of dividends, strength of business franchises and estimates of net asset value to create its portfolio. ETFis Series Trust I - Reaves Utilities ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$54.34

Average Daily Volume

19,912

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PGJ	UTES
30 Days	18.05%	13.17%
60 Days	10.50%	14.67%
90 Days	15.07%	24.08%
12 Months	10.44%	22.99%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in PGJ	Weight in UTES	Overlap

PGJ Overweight 51 Positions Relative to UTES

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	B	8.43%
TCOM	A	8.37%
BIDU	C	7.06%
YUMC	F	6.56%
NTES	D	5.78%
JD	B	5.45%
TME	B	5.32%
BEKE	B	5.07%
ZTO	C	4.42%
HTHT	B	3.56%
BZ	B	3.5%
NIO	D	3.29%
VIPS	D	3.21%
YMM	C	3.05%
TAL	B	2.72%
LI	F	1.97%
QFIN	B	1.59%
IQ	C	1.57%
ATHM	B	1.03%
BILI	C	0.99%
MNSO	B	0.96%
XPEV	F	0.89%
RLX	C	0.78%
HOLI	D	0.75%
DQ	F	0.73%
GOTU	B	0.63%
ATAT	F	0.59%
MOMO	C	0.55%
CSIQ	F	0.54%
JKS	D	0.52%
FINV	B	0.51%
ZLAB	C	0.51%
WB	C	0.49%
GDS	D	0.42%
EH	C	0.38%
TIGR	C	0.31%
HUYA	B	0.3%
NOAH	B	0.27%
SOHU	B	0.22%
QD	F	0.2%
VNET	C	0.15%
KC	D	0.15%
DDL	C	0.14%
LX	C	0.14%
TUYA	B	0.13%
CAN	F	0.13%
API	B	0.12%
DADA	F	0.11%
DOYU	B	0.1%
DAO	D	0.08%
IMAB	D	0.06%

PGJ Underweight 18 Positions Relative to UTES

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NEE	B	-17.26%
VST	B	-10.93%
CEG	B	-10.85%
PEG	A	-6.64%
PCG	B	-5.03%
ATO	C	-4.85%
CNP	B	-4.71%
EIX	A	-4.55%
SRE	A	-4.46%
ETR	A	-4.35%
DTE	A	-4.33%
NI	A	-4.27%
PNW	B	-4.21%
SO	A	-3.92%
PNM	C	-3.15%
CMS	A	-3.0%
PPL	A	-2.0%
IDA	B	-1.26%