PBW vs. QTUM ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (PBW) to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

PBW

PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio

PBW Description

The PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (Fund) is based on the WilderHill Clean Energy Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to deliver capital appreciation through the selection of companies that focus on greener and generally renewable sources of energy and technologies that facilitate cleaner energy. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.16

Average Daily Volume

332,008

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QTUM

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUM Description

The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index (the "index"). Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index or in depositary receipts representing such component securities. The index consists of a modified equal-weighted portfolio of the stock of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of quantum computing and machine learning technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$66.80

Average Daily Volume

36,961

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PBW	QTUM
30 Days	-1.27%	5.15%
60 Days	5.77%	9.38%
90 Days	1.17%	7.43%
12 Months	-21.47%	34.13%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in PBW	Weight in QTUM	Overlap

PBW Overweight 54 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BE	B	3.13%
TSLA	B	2.25%
ACHR	B	2.16%
XPEV	C	2.14%
MYRG	B	2.12%
AMSC	B	2.12%
MP	C	1.98%
ALB	B	1.91%
SLI	D	1.87%
AMPS	C	1.79%
JKS	F	1.76%
ESE	B	1.74%
ORA	B	1.73%
PWR	A	1.73%
DAR	C	1.69%
PLPC	B	1.67%
SQM	D	1.66%
ITRI	C	1.65%
JOBY	B	1.63%
ARRY	F	1.63%
AEIS	C	1.62%
ENVX	F	1.6%
PLUG	F	1.54%
REX	D	1.45%
FLNC	D	1.44%
CTVA	C	1.44%
EOSE	D	1.42%
NIO	F	1.4%
BELFB	C	1.37%
RIVN	F	1.36%
FSLR	F	1.34%
WOLF	F	1.33%
CSIQ	F	1.3%
THRM	F	1.3%
QS	F	1.28%
CHPT	F	1.25%
RNW	D	1.21%
OLED	F	1.2%
AMRC	F	1.13%
SLDP	F	1.1%
AMPX	C	1.06%
SHLS	F	1.06%
FREY	B	1.04%
MPWR	F	1.01%
LNZA	F	1.0%
WBX	F	0.85%
ENPH	F	0.81%
SEDG	F	0.8%
PLL	C	0.8%
TPIC	F	0.77%
RUN	F	0.77%
NOVA	F	0.48%
BLNK	F	0.44%
SOL	F	0.43%

PBW Underweight 50 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSTR	B	-3.19%
QBTS	B	-2.38%
RGTI	B	-2.25%
COHR	B	-2.02%
RDNT	B	-1.9%
IBM	C	-1.72%
WIT	B	-1.71%
MRVL	B	-1.71%
NOC	D	-1.7%
ACN	B	-1.7%
LMT	D	-1.69%
BABA	D	-1.66%
BAH	F	-1.64%
NOK	D	-1.63%
RTX	D	-1.59%
NVDA	B	-1.58%
TSM	B	-1.53%
JNPR	D	-1.49%
TXN	C	-1.48%
HON	C	-1.47%
HPE	B	-1.43%
GOOGL	C	-1.38%
ABBV	F	-1.35%
CDNS	B	-1.31%
MSFT	D	-1.29%
SNPS	B	-1.28%
BIDU	F	-1.27%
ADI	D	-1.26%
NVEC	B	-1.26%
ON	D	-1.25%
AMD	F	-1.25%
TDC	D	-1.2%
CRUS	D	-1.15%
MKSI	C	-1.14%
LSCC	D	-1.13%
SYNA	C	-1.12%
INTC	C	-1.11%
NXPI	D	-1.09%
KLAC	F	-1.09%
AMAT	F	-1.08%
ESTC	C	-1.07%
ONTO	F	-1.06%
QCOM	F	-1.06%
MU	D	-1.05%
MCHP	F	-1.01%
FORM	D	-1.0%
LRCX	F	-1.0%
TER	F	-0.99%
ASML	F	-0.85%
STM	F	-0.81%