OZEM vs. MVFD ETF Comparison
Comparison of Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) to Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF (MVFD)
OZEM
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
OZEM Description
OZEM targets the global weight management industry. The fund invests in companies involved in the development of GLP-1 and other weight loss drugs. GLP-1 agonists seek to aid in weight management by lowering blood sugar levels, reducing appetite, and promoting fullness. The portfolio consists of firms with GLP-1 and weight loss drugs that have been approved by or are currently undergoing Phase I, Phase II, and/or Phase III clinical trials of the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA), or any applicable food and drug regulator for non-US companies. The portfolio is constructed using a proprietary methodology, which selects companies with high levels of thematic relevance based on research of each companys public filings and disclosures. In addition, eligible securities must meet minimum market-cap and liquidity requirements. The actively managed fund, although rebalances portfolio weighting on at least a quarterly basis, may have a heavy concentration on a few names.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.29
Average Daily Volume
37,622
14
MVFD
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF
MVFD Description
MVFD focuses on equities demonstrating strong cash flow and dividend potential, shifting towards fixed income ETFs linked to US Treasurys in unfavorable cash flow scenarios. The fund seeks to mirror the performance of its target index, comprised of 40 equally weighted stocks selected for their financial health and income-producing ability, alongside up to 5 fixed income ETFs. Driving its selection process is the proprietary Volume Factor methodology, which examines stocks by analyzing the dynamics between market volume and price. This analysis is facilitated by a distinctive volume-price confirmation indicator. Evaluating a broad pool of 3,000 U.S. stocks, the methodology generates a composite score to rank and ensure that only the top-performing equities under positive financial conditions are chosen. MVFDs strategy aims for adaptability, modifying its equity-to-fixed income ratio based on prevailing financial trends. Furthermore, the index undergoes quarterly reconstitution to realign with market changes, optimizing the funds portfolio composition accordingly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.52
Average Daily Volume
6,200
39
Performance
| Period | OZEM | MVFD |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -10.60% | 3.81% |
| 60 Days | -11.17% | 6.09% |
| 90 Days | -12.25% | 7.28% |
| 12 Months |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in OZEM | Weight in MVFD | Overlap |
|---|
OZEM Underweight 39 Positions Relative to MVFD
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MO | A | -3.74% | |
| FOX | A | -3.57% | |
| TGNA | B | -3.47% | |
| FOXA | A | -3.36% | |
| HLNE | B | -3.3% | |
| BKH | A | -3.08% | |
| VOYA | B | -3.0% | |
| JHG | B | -2.92% | |
| MATX | C | -2.88% | |
| ADTN | A | -2.85% | |
| ABM | B | -2.85% | |
| QCOM | F | -2.71% | |
| MLI | B | -2.7% | |
| NYT | D | -2.62% | |
| SR | A | -2.59% | |
| EXPD | C | -2.47% | |
| PM | B | -2.36% | |
| LPX | B | -2.35% | |
| RHI | C | -2.35% | |
| WKC | C | -2.35% | |
| MEI | F | -2.33% | |
| SEM | B | -2.31% | |
| AFL | B | -2.27% | |
| CCK | D | -2.23% | |
| GILD | C | -2.18% | |
| CHRD | D | -2.17% | |
| NTAP | C | -2.14% | |
| CL | D | -2.13% | |
| SSNC | B | -2.12% | |
| AMKR | D | -2.08% | |
| CME | B | -2.07% | |
| WD | D | -2.05% | |
| NRG | B | -2.04% | |
| ALLY | C | -2.04% | |
| TTC | C | -1.93% | |
| EXPI | D | -1.9% | |
| KBH | D | -1.87% | |
| ADM | D | -1.86% | |
| BCO | F | -1.7% |
OZEM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
MVFD: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
