NSCS vs. BLDG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Nuveen Small Cap Select ETF (NSCS) to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG)

NSCS

Nuveen Small Cap Select ETF

NSCS Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of the sum of its net assets and the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in exchange-traded common stocks of small-capitalization companies. It may invest up to 15% of its total assets in non-dollar denominated equity securities of non-U.S. issuers listed on a foreign exchange that trade on such exchange contemporaneously with the shares of the fund. Up to 15% of the fund's total assets may be invested in equity securities of emerging market issuers.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.69

Average Daily Volume

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

BLDG

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF

BLDG Description

The investment seeks income and capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, primarily in the securities of domestic and foreign, including developed and emerging market, companies principally engaged in the real estate sector and real-estate related industries (collectively, ?real estate companies?) that exhibit favorable multi-factor metrics, such as value, quality and momentum, according to a quantitative methodology developed by Cambria Investment Management, L.P., the fund?s investment adviser (?Cambria?).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.50

Average Daily Volume

2,649

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	NSCS	BLDG
30 Days	5.67%	4.84%
60 Days	0.89%	-0.03%
90 Days	5.77%	0.25%
12 Months	26.00%	2.09%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in NSCS	Weight in BLDG	Overlap
	EGP	D	1.32%	1.19%	1.19%
	STAG	D	1.38%	1.23%	1.23%

NSCS Overweight 77 Positions Relative to BLDG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PR	C	2.39%
WTFC	B	2.17%
NOG	C	2.11%
EVR	B	2.08%
ONTO	B	1.78%
SMTC	B	1.77%
QTWO	A	1.74%
PRMW	B	1.72%
PIPR	A	1.67%
HQY	D	1.65%
MTDR	D	1.63%
SMCI	D	1.61%
CVLT	A	1.56%
FIX	B	1.52%
ASGN	C	1.49%
EHC	A	1.47%
ICHR	D	1.46%
SSB	C	1.46%
ASO	F	1.45%
HOMB	B	1.43%
MMS	B	1.41%
ESE	C	1.4%
AIT	C	1.4%
OPCH	D	1.37%
SLGN	B	1.36%
NPO	D	1.32%
ACA	A	1.32%
KEX	A	1.28%
BKH	B	1.28%
KTOS	B	1.26%
SHOO	C	1.25%
PFBC	A	1.23%
SUM	D	1.23%
AVAV	A	1.19%
AVNT	B	1.19%
SLAB	D	1.17%
MODG	C	1.17%
BANR	B	1.12%
DAN	C	1.08%
SPT	F	1.05%
DO	B	1.04%
BRBR	C	1.01%
PWSC	D	1.0%
LADR	B	1.0%
WK	D	0.99%
FRSH	F	0.97%
SEM	A	0.97%
ARCB	D	0.96%
TTMI	A	0.96%
ZD	D	0.93%
SR	B	0.92%
MGNI	F	0.92%
EVRI	F	0.89%
GKOS	A	0.89%
ENV	B	0.87%
PGNY	F	0.83%
ARRY	F	0.83%
BYD	F	0.81%
SIG	D	0.8%
PRI	D	0.76%
ESTA	B	0.76%
INN	F	0.74%
ATRC	F	0.73%
HALO	B	0.7%
THC	A	0.7%
KRYS	D	0.66%
SIBN	F	0.66%
PCRX	D	0.63%
VKTX	C	0.57%
CRNX	B	0.56%
RBRK	F	0.54%
TCMD	F	0.5%
IMVT	F	0.49%
GDYN	F	0.44%
MYGN	A	0.42%
MDGL	D	0.39%
CYTK	D	0.38%

NSCS Underweight 42 Positions Relative to BLDG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DEI	B	-1.49%
PGRE	B	-1.48%
PDM	B	-1.47%
BDN	B	-1.46%
HIW	B	-1.45%
AKR	C	-1.41%
AVB	A	-1.4%
EQR	A	-1.4%
WELL	A	-1.4%
BXP	D	-1.39%
IIPR	C	-1.39%
SBRA	B	-1.37%
WSR	B	-1.36%
BNL	B	-1.35%
CTRE	C	-1.35%
EQC	B	-1.34%
ESRT	C	-1.34%
CUZ	B	-1.33%
KRC	D	-1.3%
EPR	C	-1.3%
SITC	D	-1.3%
IVT	C	-1.29%
REG	D	-1.28%
OHI	C	-1.28%
VNO	F	-1.28%
BRX	B	-1.28%
AMH	C	-1.28%
ROIC	D	-1.27%
BFS	C	-1.25%
PEB	D	-1.22%
SKT	D	-1.21%
PK	D	-1.2%
APLE	D	-1.19%
CLDT	F	-1.18%
DRH	F	-1.18%
HST	D	-1.18%
SHO	D	-1.18%
HPP	F	-1.17%
RLJ	F	-1.14%
REXR	D	-1.11%
FSP	F	-1.1%
NXDT	F	-0.0%