MVFD vs. RSPC ETF Comparison
Comparison of Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF (MVFD) to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC)
MVFD
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF
MVFD Description
MVFD focuses on equities demonstrating strong cash flow and dividend potential, shifting towards fixed income ETFs linked to US Treasurys in unfavorable cash flow scenarios. The fund seeks to mirror the performance of its target index, comprised of 40 equally weighted stocks selected for their financial health and income-producing ability, alongside up to 5 fixed income ETFs. Driving its selection process is the proprietary Volume Factor methodology, which examines stocks by analyzing the dynamics between market volume and price. This analysis is facilitated by a distinctive volume-price confirmation indicator. Evaluating a broad pool of 3,000 U.S. stocks, the methodology generates a composite score to rank and ensure that only the top-performing equities under positive financial conditions are chosen. MVFDs strategy aims for adaptability, modifying its equity-to-fixed income ratio based on prevailing financial trends. Furthermore, the index undergoes quarterly reconstitution to realign with market changes, optimizing the funds portfolio composition accordingly.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.19
Average Daily Volume
4,195
39
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
RSPC Description
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500® Communication Services Index, an index that contains the common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500® Index that are classified as members of the communication services sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$33.12
Average Daily Volume
14,207
25
Performance
Period | MVFD | RSPC |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -1.91% | 1.84% |
60 Days | 2.78% | 5.75% |
90 Days | 7.97% | 10.51% |
12 Months | 22.75% |
MVFD Overweight 36 Positions Relative to RSPC
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
MO | A | 3.7% | |
TGNA | B | 3.31% | |
HLNE | B | 3.21% | |
VOYA | B | 3.06% | |
MATX | A | 2.96% | |
BKH | D | 2.93% | |
ABM | A | 2.86% | |
JHG | A | 2.84% | |
ADTN | B | 2.83% | |
QCOM | D | 2.82% | |
EXPD | D | 2.53% | |
MLI | A | 2.52% | |
SR | D | 2.46% | |
CCK | B | 2.42% | |
PM | B | 2.42% | |
MEI | F | 2.37% | |
SEM | B | 2.35% | |
WKC | D | 2.31% | |
GILD | A | 2.28% | |
RHI | C | 2.24% | |
AFL | D | 2.2% | |
AMKR | F | 2.2% | |
CL | F | 2.18% | |
WD | C | 2.15% | |
NTAP | D | 2.15% | |
CHRD | F | 2.13% | |
LPX | C | 2.12% | |
CME | B | 2.11% | |
SSNC | D | 2.1% | |
EXPI | B | 2.09% | |
ALLY | F | 2.05% | |
ADM | F | 2.0% | |
TTC | F | 1.99% | |
BCO | C | 1.99% | |
NRG | A | 1.96% | |
KBH | C | 1.95% |
MVFD Underweight 22 Positions Relative to RSPC
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
LYV | A | -5.22% | |
TMUS | B | -5.1% | |
META | B | -4.79% | |
NFLX | A | -4.79% | |
MTCH | D | -4.73% | |
TTWO | A | -4.69% | |
CMCSA | A | -4.66% | |
DIS | C | -4.66% | |
T | B | -4.54% | |
OMC | A | -4.45% | |
TKO | D | -4.41% | |
EA | A | -4.4% | |
FYBR | B | -4.39% | |
PARA | C | -4.32% | |
CHTR | A | -4.32% | |
IPG | F | -4.29% | |
VZ | D | -4.17% | |
WBD | C | -3.92% | |
NWSA | A | -3.35% | |
GOOGL | A | -2.5% | |
GOOG | A | -2.08% | |
NWS | A | -1.06% |
MVFD: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RSPC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords