MID vs. NBDS ETF Comparison

Comparison of American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) to Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS)
MID

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF

MID Description

The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$55.17

Average Daily Volume

5,124

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
NBDS

Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF

NBDS Description Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC. It invests in public equity markets of global region. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across information technology, healthcare, communication services, and consumer discretionary sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. It invests in stocks of companies that are deemed socially conscious in their business dealings and directly promote environmental responsibility. It employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.02

Average Daily Volume

3,101

Number of Holdings *

25

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MID NBDS
30 Days -3.68% -6.31%
60 Days -2.58% -7.03%
90 Days 6.64% 1.49%
12 Months 25.73% 31.05%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MID Weight in NBDS Overlap
DXCM D 3.98% 2.5% 2.5%
KEYS D 2.78% 2.7% 2.7%
MPWR C 5.59% 3.51% 3.51%
SWAV A 1.64% 2.57% 1.64%
MID Overweight 30 Positions Relative to NBDS
Symbol Grade Weight
MANH F 6.1%
CDNS D 5.67%
RSG B 4.79%
VRT A 4.68%
MSCI F 4.14%
ESI D 4.01%
AVNT A 3.83%
IQV D 3.8%
TT A 3.63%
ABNB C 3.6%
CMG A 3.58%
BFAM D 3.43%
DUOL A 2.94%
CHD A 2.89%
HUBB D 2.81%
XYL A 2.63%
TECH B 2.53%
J C 2.45%
GEHC D 2.11%
INSP A 1.99%
ENPH F 1.98%
NTRA A 1.95%
EE A 1.93%
ONON D 1.57%
PODD D 1.56%
ARGX D 1.5%
EFX D 0.99%
CNM A 0.98%
ALNY D 0.89%
VKTX B 0.75%
MID Underweight 21 Positions Relative to NBDS
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA C -7.99%
UBER D -5.43%
AMD D -5.07%
AMZN B -4.57%
ASML D -4.55%
TW B -4.36%
LLY B -4.34%
INTU C -4.32%
ISRG C -4.29%
TDG A -4.02%
ONTO B -4.01%
MSFT C -3.71%
DKNG C -3.46%
NOW D -3.38%
MDB D -3.29%
RMBS F -3.17%
MRNA A -3.07%
PANW B -2.91%
IDXX D -2.75%
SPOT B -2.27%
PCOR D -2.06%
Compare ETFs