LGHT vs. IQM ETF Comparison
Comparison of Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) to Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM)
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
LGHT Description
LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$10.35
Average Daily Volume
915
31
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
IQM Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies that are relevant to its investment theme of intelligent machines. The fund invests predominantly in common stock. Although it may invest across economic sectors, the advisor expects to have significant positions in particular sectors including technology. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$67.51
Average Daily Volume
4,309
49
Performance
| Period | LGHT | IQM |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -1.96% | 5.98% |
| 60 Days | -2.17% | 9.16% |
| 90 Days | -1.81% | 7.34% |
| 12 Months | 41.76% |
LGHT Overweight 28 Positions Relative to IQM
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEHC | D | 8.56% | |
| RMD | C | 6.71% | |
| IQV | F | 6.34% | |
| DXCM | C | 5.51% | |
| PODD | C | 5.26% | |
| VEEV | C | 5.15% | |
| PHG | C | 4.87% | |
| ZBH | C | 3.57% | |
| BNTX | C | 3.53% | |
| MASI | B | 2.46% | |
| DOCS | C | 2.06% | |
| MRNA | F | 1.72% | |
| ALKS | C | 0.66% | |
| TNDM | D | 0.54% | |
| IRTC | C | 0.44% | |
| PRVA | C | 0.44% | |
| OMCL | C | 0.42% | |
| LFST | B | 0.31% | |
| TDOC | C | 0.28% | |
| PGNY | F | 0.25% | |
| EVH | F | 0.22% | |
| SDGR | C | 0.21% | |
| GDRX | F | 0.2% | |
| ALHC | C | 0.2% | |
| PHR | F | 0.17% | |
| ACCD | D | 0.07% | |
| MODV | C | 0.03% | |
| TBRG | B | 0.03% |
LGHT Underweight 46 Positions Relative to IQM
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | B | -13.78% | |
| AXON | A | -5.49% | |
| TSLA | B | -4.19% | |
| AAPL | C | -4.09% | |
| TSM | B | -4.05% | |
| CDNS | B | -3.99% | |
| SNPS | B | -3.87% | |
| ASML | F | -2.85% | |
| PWR | A | -2.63% | |
| AMAT | F | -2.49% | |
| AVGO | D | -2.12% | |
| AMD | F | -2.09% | |
| ADSK | A | -1.94% | |
| TER | F | -1.45% | |
| ADI | D | -1.36% | |
| APH | A | -1.33% | |
| UBER | F | -1.33% | |
| PTC | B | -1.31% | |
| KLAC | F | -1.31% | |
| VMI | B | -1.2% | |
| ALTR | B | -1.2% | |
| LRCX | F | -1.19% | |
| GEV | B | -1.16% | |
| VRT | B | -1.1% | |
| ETN | A | -1.04% | |
| ZBRA | B | -1.02% | |
| AVAV | C | -1.0% | |
| CRWD | B | -0.85% | |
| ROP | B | -0.84% | |
| KEYS | A | -0.8% | |
| IDXX | F | -0.71% | |
| TXN | C | -0.7% | |
| ENTG | D | -0.65% | |
| BKR | A | -0.55% | |
| IOT | A | -0.53% | |
| TRMB | B | -0.48% | |
| NXPI | D | -0.45% | |
| BSY | F | -0.39% | |
| FSLR | F | -0.36% | |
| PSTG | D | -0.35% | |
| PLTR | B | -0.33% | |
| SITM | B | -0.31% | |
| MCHP | F | -0.3% | |
| FTI | A | -0.26% | |
| OII | B | -0.26% | |
| MPWR | F | -0.19% |
LGHT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
IQM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
