KWEB vs. BETZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ)
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KWEB Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of a specific foreign equity securities benchmark. The fund will normally invest at least 80% of its total assets in equity securities of its current benchmark, the CSI Overseas China Internet Index or in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of the investable universe of publicly traded China-based companies whose primary business or businesses are in the Internet and Internet-related sectors. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.17
Average Daily Volume
19,303,618
16
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
BETZ Description
The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) will be invested in securities issued by Sports Betting and iGaming Companies. The index tracks the performance of the common stock (or corresponding American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) or Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs)) of exchange-listed companies that earn revenue from online gaming (iGaming).Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$17.06
Average Daily Volume
16,149
15
Performance
Period | KWEB | BETZ |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 11.99% | -2.51% |
60 Days | 16.08% | -5.07% |
90 Days | 30.44% | -5.06% |
12 Months | 14.03% | 0.12% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in KWEB | Weight in BETZ | Overlap |
---|
KWEB: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
BETZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords