JGRW vs. FCLD ETF Comparison

Comparison of Trust for Professional Managers Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) to Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD)

JGRW

Trust for Professional Managers Jensen Quality Growth ETF

JGRW Description

To achieve the fund"s investment objective of long-term capital appreciation, the fund invests in equity securities of approximately 25 to 30 companies Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities of companies meeting the criteria for quality and growth as determined by the fund's investment adviser,. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.62

Average Daily Volume

40,981

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FCLD

Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF

FCLD Description

The fund seeks to provide investment returns that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index. Normally investing at least 80% of assets in securities included in the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index and in depositary receipts representing securities included in the index. The Fidelity Cloud Computing Index is designed to reflect the performance of a global universe of companies across the market capitalization spectrum that provide products or services enabling the increased adoption of cloud computing, characterized by the delivery of computing services over the internet

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.35

Average Daily Volume

14,361

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	JGRW	FCLD
30 Days	1.17%	18.74%
60 Days	0.85%	21.70%
90 Days	2.39%	24.10%
12 Months		42.86%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in JGRW	Weight in FCLD	Overlap
	INTU	C	6.11%	4.27%	4.27%
	MSFT	F	7.33%	3.85%	3.85%

JGRW Overweight 25 Positions Relative to FCLD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AAPL	C	7.2%
ACN	C	7.15%
SYK	C	5.97%
MMC	B	5.88%
GOOGL	C	5.67%
ADP	B	4.35%
MA	C	4.34%
UNH	C	3.83%
PEP	F	3.51%
ZTS	D	3.31%
TXN	C	3.3%
BR	A	3.19%
KLAC	D	2.94%
WM	A	2.86%
EFX	F	2.69%
PG	A	2.6%
JNJ	D	2.36%
NKE	D	2.21%
VRSK	A	1.95%
APH	A	1.87%
SHW	A	1.77%
CPRT	A	1.72%
HD	A	1.69%
MCD	D	1.59%
BALL	D	1.29%

JGRW Underweight 46 Positions Relative to FCLD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CRM	B	-5.14%
MSTR	C	-4.92%
ORCL	B	-4.92%
NOW	A	-4.68%
EQIX	A	-3.15%
TEAM	A	-3.1%
DLR	B	-2.92%
HUBS	A	-2.76%
WDAY	B	-2.75%
SNOW	C	-2.63%
DDOG	A	-2.54%
TWLO	A	-2.4%
HPE	B	-2.37%
ZM	B	-2.21%
NTAP	C	-1.99%
DAY	B	-1.96%
MDB	C	-1.93%
NTNX	A	-1.91%
FFIV	B	-1.88%
WDC	D	-1.84%
STX	D	-1.77%
XRX	F	-1.75%
PSTG	D	-1.74%
DT	C	-1.67%
CFLT	B	-1.64%
ESTC	C	-1.52%
CVLT	B	-1.49%
DBX	B	-1.42%
GTLB	B	-1.34%
PEGA	A	-1.26%
PATH	C	-1.24%
BOX	B	-1.2%
FIVN	C	-1.19%
RNG	B	-1.18%
VERX	B	-1.14%
AI	B	-1.1%
TDC	D	-1.0%
FROG	C	-0.99%
SMCI	F	-0.91%
PD	C	-0.88%
DOCN	D	-0.88%
VRNT	C	-0.77%
FSLY	D	-0.75%
INFA	D	-0.7%
VNET	B	-0.65%
SWI	B	-0.64%

JGRW: Top Represented Industries & Keywords

Industries: Business Services Auto & Truck Dealerships Beverages - Soft Drinks Consumer Electronics Credit Services Drug Manufacturers - Major Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Electronic Components Footwear & Accessories Health Care Plans Home Improvement Stores Household & Personal Products Information Technology Services Insurance Brokers Internet Content & Information Medical Devices Packaging & Containers Restaurants Semiconductor Equipment & Materials Semiconductors