IPDP vs. OSEA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA)
IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$18.42

Average Daily Volume

1,561

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
OSEA

Harbor International Compounders ETF

OSEA Description Harbor International Compounders ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Harbor Capital Advisors, Inc. The fund is co-managed by C Worldwide Asset Management FondsmÆGlerselskab A/S. The fund invests in public equity markets of global ex-US region. It invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. The fund invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. It invests in stocks of companies that are deemed socially conscious in their business dealings and directly promote environmental responsibility. The fund employs fundamental analysis to create its portfolio. The fund employs proprietary and external research to create its portfolio. Harbor International Compounders ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.73

Average Daily Volume

84,982

Number of Holdings *

5

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period IPDP OSEA
30 Days 2.21% 3.51%
60 Days 1.72% 0.82%
90 Days 6.69% 5.06%
12 Months 30.59% 11.39%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in IPDP Weight in OSEA Overlap
IPDP Overweight 49 Positions Relative to OSEA
Symbol Grade Weight
TT A 2.52%
ETN A 2.5%
APOG A 2.47%
APH A 2.42%
AVGO C 2.35%
DOV A 2.34%
HIG C 2.31%
QCOM B 2.3%
TRV D 2.26%
KLAC A 2.23%
A C 2.2%
DCI B 2.19%
CTAS B 2.18%
RGA A 2.18%
ITT A 2.16%
MCK B 2.14%
GWW D 2.1%
GPC B 2.07%
SEIC C 2.06%
ELV A 2.05%
FAST D 2.04%
SYK D 2.04%
SHW D 2.04%
AIT C 2.03%
BRC B 2.0%
AOS C 1.98%
ABM B 1.97%
HD D 1.96%
ADP D 1.95%
MSI A 1.92%
CSX D 1.92%
ABT F 1.91%
HI D 1.87%
WTS C 1.87%
PAYX D 1.86%
JNJ F 1.85%
MMC C 1.83%
UPS D 1.8%
ROK F 1.79%
CAH F 1.79%
SNA D 1.77%
CSCO D 1.77%
CHE D 1.75%
NSP C 1.71%
ACN D 1.66%
UNH C 1.63%
AAPL B 1.62%
GL F 1.23%
HUM F 1.11%
IPDP Underweight 5 Positions Relative to OSEA
Symbol Grade Weight
NVO D -6.34%
FERG B -6.02%
HDB D -4.98%
LIN D -4.8%
TSM B -4.29%
Compare ETFs