FLV vs. LGHT ETF Comparison
Comparison of American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) to Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT)
FLV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
FLV Description
The investment seeks long-term capital growth. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of large capitalization companies. The portfolio managers may sell stocks from the fund's portfolio if they believe a stock no longer meets their valuation criteria, a stock's risk parameters outweigh its return opportunity, more attractive alternatives are identified or specific events alter a stock's prospects.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$69.11
Average Daily Volume
5,387
38
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
LGHT Description
LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$10.28
Average Daily Volume
686
31
Performance
| Period | FLV | LGHT |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.43% | -3.23% |
| 60 Days | -0.56% | -3.02% |
| 90 Days | 4.89% | 2.70% |
| 12 Months | 21.12% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in FLV | Weight in LGHT | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZBH | C | 3.78% | 3.55% | 3.55% |
FLV Overweight 37 Positions Relative to LGHT
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJ | D | 7.21% | |
| UL | D | 4.05% | |
| MDT | B | 3.91% | |
| DUK | C | 3.81% | |
| UPS | C | 3.57% | |
| NSC | B | 3.55% | |
| JPM | A | 3.04% | |
| ADI | C | 3.03% | |
| TFC | C | 3.01% | |
| OKE | B | 2.9% | |
| XOM | C | 2.85% | |
| BRK.A | D | 2.54% | |
| ATO | B | 2.47% | |
| UNH | C | 2.28% | |
| GIS | D | 2.27% | |
| CSCO | B | 2.19% | |
| HSIC | D | 2.14% | |
| BDX | C | 2.07% | |
| SCHW | B | 2.03% | |
| AMT | D | 2.01% | |
| BK | B | 1.98% | |
| RGA | C | 1.92% | |
| KVUE | B | 1.86% | |
| ALL | C | 1.85% | |
| BUD | D | 1.85% | |
| VZ | D | 1.83% | |
| MDLZ | D | 1.83% | |
| CAG | D | 1.81% | |
| FFIV | A | 1.74% | |
| KMB | D | 1.7% | |
| GPK | D | 1.55% | |
| ROK | B | 1.51% | |
| SNY | D | 1.5% | |
| RTX | C | 1.49% | |
| MMC | D | 1.25% | |
| DGX | B | 1.03% | |
| TTE | F | 0.94% |
FLV Underweight 30 Positions Relative to LGHT
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISRG | B | -14.59% | |
| GEHC | D | -9.12% | |
| RMD | A | -7.12% | |
| IQV | F | -6.5% | |
| DXCM | C | -5.26% | |
| PHG | D | -5.01% | |
| VEEV | B | -4.73% | |
| PODD | A | -4.72% | |
| BNTX | B | -3.9% | |
| ALGN | F | -2.67% | |
| MRNA | F | -2.38% | |
| MASI | A | -2.24% | |
| DOCS | A | -1.67% | |
| PRCT | A | -1.35% | |
| TNDM | F | -0.6% | |
| ALKS | F | -0.6% | |
| OMCL | B | -0.45% | |
| EVH | D | -0.41% | |
| IRTC | C | -0.39% | |
| PRVA | B | -0.38% | |
| LFST | C | -0.3% | |
| TDOC | C | -0.29% | |
| PGNY | F | -0.28% | |
| GDRX | F | -0.27% | |
| ALHC | A | -0.2% | |
| SDGR | F | -0.19% | |
| PHR | F | -0.15% | |
| ACCD | F | -0.06% | |
| TBRG | A | -0.03% | |
| MODV | F | -0.03% |
FLV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
LGHT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
