FLCH vs. ERTH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) to Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)

FLCH

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCH Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that closely correspond the FTSE China RIC Capped Index (the FTSE China Capped Index). Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the index and in depositary receipts representing such securities. The index is based on the FTSE China Index and is designed to measure the performance of Chinese large- and mid-capitalization stocks, as represented by H-Shares and B-Shares. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$16.84

Average Daily Volume

77,547

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ERTH

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

ERTH Description

The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (Fund) is based on the MSCI Global Environment Select Index (Index). The Fund will generally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is comprised of companies that focus on offering products or services that contribute to a more environmentally sustainable economy by making a more efficient use of global resources. The Index is designed to maximize exposure to six Environmental Impact Themes: alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable water, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable agriculture. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$39.91

Average Daily Volume

10,330

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	FLCH	ERTH
30 Days	-4.25%	-5.83%
60 Days	1.45%	-0.38%
90 Days	8.39%	-5.23%
12 Months	-0.62%	-14.61%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in FLCH	Weight in ERTH	Overlap
LI	F	0.47%	2.8%	0.47%
NIO	F	0.27%	1.49%	0.27%
TUYA	F	0.02%	0.1%	0.02%
XPEV	F	0.22%	1.11%	0.22%

FLCH Overweight 22 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	F	7.49%
PDD	C	4.15%
TCOM	D	1.25%
BIDU	F	1.21%
YUMC	F	0.63%
BEKE	D	0.47%
TME	B	0.43%
BGNE	D	0.37%
BZ	D	0.32%
YMM	C	0.29%
VIPS	F	0.25%
TAL	D	0.2%
BILI	B	0.18%
QFIN	B	0.11%
ATHM	B	0.08%
IQ	F	0.08%
RLX	D	0.07%
YY	F	0.05%
DQ	F	0.05%
WB	F	0.03%
GDS	B	0.03%
DADA	F	0.01%

FLCH Underweight 36 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FSLR	C	-6.38%
DLR	B	-5.38%
TSLA	C	-5.07%
ENPH	D	-3.99%
WMS	C	-3.06%
RIVN	C	-1.97%
MTH	D	-1.47%
BMI	C	-1.38%
DAR	D	-1.34%
KBH	B	-1.29%
VNO	B	-1.07%
WFG	D	-1.05%
ORA	C	-1.04%
CUZ	D	-0.9%
RUN	C	-0.69%
NEP	D	-0.65%
LCID	F	-0.58%
DEI	C	-0.57%
SEDG	F	-0.52%
ARRY	F	-0.48%
PLUG	F	-0.43%
AAT	B	-0.3%
SHLS	F	-0.29%
JKS	F	-0.2%
PGRE	D	-0.2%
BZH	D	-0.19%
BDN	D	-0.19%
ERII	F	-0.15%
CHPT	F	-0.14%
REX	F	-0.14%
AMPS	D	-0.09%
RENB	C	-0.08%
RDUS	F	-0.08%
MERC	D	-0.07%
SPWR	D	-0.07%
MNTK	C	-0.07%