ETEC vs. QVAL ETF Comparison
Comparison of iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) to ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL)
ETEC
iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF
ETEC Description
ETEC provides exposure to global equities categorized as emerging green technology. Selection begins with the initial index universe that then excludes companies involved in controversial issues against UNGC principles. Stocks are reviewed to meet revenue derived from eight sustainable themes: energy efficiency, green buildings and transportation, pollution prevention and reduction, renewable energy, resource efficiency technologies and services, water, and sustainable agriculture, food, and forestry. The fund excludes companies with total sustainable product revenue less than 25%. The remaining stocks are screened further to only include companies classified as green technologies. Stocks are scored within the Rogers innovation adoption curve to determine their position across the innovators-laggards spectrum, which contributes to an aggregate score. The top 50 companies with the highest aggregate scores are selected. The market cap-weighted index is reconstituted annually in December and rebalanced quarterly.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$19.80
Average Daily Volume
521
11
QVAL
ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
QVAL Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$46.73
Average Daily Volume
18,437
50
Performance
| Period | ETEC | QVAL |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -3.23% | 4.01% |
| 60 Days | -7.26% | 2.30% |
| 90 Days | -3.37% | 4.43% |
| 12 Months | -6.86% | 26.73% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in ETEC | Weight in QVAL | Overlap |
|---|
ETEC Underweight 50 Positions Relative to QVAL
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPR | B | -2.28% | |
| BKR | B | -2.26% | |
| UAL | A | -2.22% | |
| MO | A | -2.19% | |
| TAP | C | -2.18% | |
| FTI | A | -2.15% | |
| ALSN | B | -2.14% | |
| HES | B | -2.14% | |
| FOXA | B | -2.12% | |
| LRN | A | -2.12% | |
| GTES | A | -2.11% | |
| DAL | C | -2.1% | |
| SNA | A | -2.1% | |
| WFRD | D | -2.07% | |
| TGT | F | -2.07% | |
| URBN | C | -2.06% | |
| SM | B | -2.06% | |
| ANF | C | -2.05% | |
| SIG | B | -2.02% | |
| JBL | B | -2.02% | |
| CTSH | B | -2.02% | |
| TOL | B | -2.01% | |
| MHK | D | -2.0% | |
| HPQ | B | -2.0% | |
| CMCSA | B | -1.99% | |
| MMM | D | -1.99% | |
| TEX | D | -1.99% | |
| UTHR | C | -1.98% | |
| WSM | B | -1.97% | |
| CAT | B | -1.97% | |
| HRB | D | -1.96% | |
| CVS | D | -1.95% | |
| GPK | C | -1.95% | |
| BBY | D | -1.94% | |
| DKS | C | -1.94% | |
| LEN | D | -1.92% | |
| CNH | C | -1.9% | |
| ELV | F | -1.9% | |
| THC | D | -1.89% | |
| OMC | C | -1.89% | |
| LYB | F | -1.88% | |
| CNC | D | -1.87% | |
| FCX | D | -1.87% | |
| UHS | D | -1.87% | |
| CRI | D | -1.85% | |
| IPG | D | -1.8% | |
| MAT | D | -1.78% | |
| MOH | F | -1.76% | |
| ASO | F | -1.76% | |
| CROX | D | -1.7% |
ETEC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
QVAL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
