ESGX vs. AMID ETF Comparison

Comparison of Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF (ESGX) to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID)
ESGX

Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF

ESGX Description

ESGX invests in US-listed companies determined to have high shareholder value, unencumbered by ESG restrictions, such as political stances or conforming to a greater social goal of stakeholder capitalism. Using a proprietary methodology, the fund assigns stocks with shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The shareholder value creation score considers information on corporate donations, advocacy, activities, and policies gathered from different data sources. The financial metrics score separately calculates a securitys one-year and five-year price performance, closing price, cash, revenue, debt-to-equity ratio, average dividend yield, profit margin, and market capitalization. Companies are ranked according to the highest shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The fund selects and weights 50 companies from the resulting sets of filtered companies. The index is rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.79

Average Daily Volume

101

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.72

Average Daily Volume

7,812

Number of Holdings *

37

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period ESGX AMID
30 Days -0.71% 4.32%
60 Days 0.93% 3.96%
90 Days 4.88%
12 Months 34.06%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in ESGX Weight in AMID Overlap
TPX B 2.26% 1.99% 1.99%
ESGX Overweight 48 Positions Relative to AMID
Symbol Grade Weight
GTLS A 2.58%
WST C 2.51%
TYL B 2.4%
VTRS A 2.37%
SEIC B 2.33%
NWS A 2.33%
RLI A 2.33%
VNO C 2.3%
GEF A 2.27%
JBHT C 2.24%
EVRG A 2.21%
PNR A 2.19%
SLGN A 2.17%
VRSN C 2.16%
SYY D 2.14%
IBOC B 2.11%
EHC B 2.1%
FFIV B 2.08%
KIM A 2.07%
SYNA C 2.06%
PNW A 2.06%
TDY B 2.05%
DCI B 2.04%
DXCM C 2.02%
ROL B 2.02%
MANH D 1.97%
RVTY F 1.95%
KEYS A 1.92%
FRT B 1.91%
LKQ F 1.88%
HST C 1.88%
MAA B 1.85%
STE D 1.82%
POOL C 1.82%
CNP A 1.81%
SWKS F 1.81%
O C 1.75%
GPC D 1.74%
POST C 1.73%
WEX D 1.7%
MCHP F 1.69%
KNSL B 1.67%
EGP D 1.67%
BCO F 1.54%
LNTH D 1.52%
HII F 1.45%
QRVO F 1.19%
ENPH F 1.09%
ESGX Underweight 36 Positions Relative to AMID
Symbol Grade Weight
FICO B -3.79%
CTAS B -3.66%
CPRT B -3.56%
BLDR D -3.43%
FTNT C -3.34%
HLI A -3.2%
CBZ B -2.93%
LPLA A -2.87%
CDW F -2.86%
VCTR B -2.86%
DHI F -2.85%
IT C -2.83%
MEDP D -2.69%
MUSA B -2.63%
HCA F -2.49%
BAH F -2.45%
BLD D -2.43%
OMF A -2.4%
URI C -2.35%
AFG A -2.28%
GDDY A -2.24%
A D -2.12%
ADUS D -2.09%
CG B -2.05%
SCI B -2.05%
AME A -1.98%
ICFI F -1.93%
LNG A -1.69%
CHDN B -1.57%
ABG C -1.55%
ENTG D -1.52%
MOH F -1.44%
PATK C -1.35%
TTEK F -1.33%
AX B -1.11%
EXPO D -0.99%
Compare ETFs