CSD vs. XMHQ ETF Comparison
Comparison of Guggenheim Spin-Off ETF (CSD) to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ)
CSD
Guggenheim Spin-Off ETF
CSD Description
The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an equity index called the Beacon Spin-off Index. The fund invests at least 90% of its assets in common stock, ADRs and MLPs that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing common stocks included in the index. It generally will invest in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$86.65
Average Daily Volume
2,219
24
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
XMHQ Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400® Index.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$105.30
Average Daily Volume
310,805
76
Performance
| Period | CSD | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 6.29% | 3.12% |
| 60 Days | 8.22% | 3.51% |
| 90 Days | 14.87% | 3.55% |
| 12 Months | 47.42% | 28.09% |
CSD Overweight 22 Positions Relative to XMHQ
CSD Underweight 74 Positions Relative to XMHQ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MANH | D | -4.08% | |
| CSL | C | -3.86% | |
| EME | A | -3.81% | |
| WSM | C | -3.43% | |
| FIX | A | -2.48% | |
| THC | D | -2.39% | |
| RS | B | -2.38% | |
| RNR | C | -2.28% | |
| OC | A | -2.16% | |
| LECO | C | -2.08% | |
| GGG | B | -2.05% | |
| TOL | B | -2.03% | |
| PSTG | D | -1.86% | |
| CW | C | -1.83% | |
| KNSL | B | -1.8% | |
| DT | D | -1.66% | |
| MEDP | D | -1.62% | |
| BLD | D | -1.59% | |
| DKS | D | -1.57% | |
| EXP | B | -1.45% | |
| MUSA | B | -1.43% | |
| AYI | B | -1.43% | |
| AIT | B | -1.4% | |
| CVLT | B | -1.38% | |
| PRI | B | -1.35% | |
| WMS | F | -1.34% | |
| INGR | C | -1.32% | |
| AFG | A | -1.3% | |
| RGLD | C | -1.3% | |
| CHE | D | -1.3% | |
| TREX | C | -1.3% | |
| SEIC | B | -1.28% | |
| PCTY | C | -1.22% | |
| UFPI | C | -1.21% | |
| CNM | D | -1.2% | |
| CELH | F | -1.13% | |
| LSTR | D | -1.13% | |
| DCI | B | -1.12% | |
| RLI | A | -1.1% | |
| LSCC | D | -1.09% | |
| SAIC | F | -1.03% | |
| CROX | D | -1.02% | |
| SSD | F | -1.01% | |
| WFRD | D | -0.96% | |
| QLYS | B | -0.94% | |
| LNTH | D | -0.94% | |
| G | B | -0.94% | |
| ELF | C | -0.93% | |
| COKE | C | -0.9% | |
| ROIV | C | -0.9% | |
| CHX | C | -0.88% | |
| DINO | D | -0.87% | |
| KBH | D | -0.85% | |
| MSA | F | -0.84% | |
| CBT | D | -0.82% | |
| MTG | C | -0.81% | |
| VVV | D | -0.8% | |
| ESNT | F | -0.74% | |
| EXPO | D | -0.74% | |
| CRUS | D | -0.66% | |
| MSM | C | -0.66% | |
| LOPE | C | -0.64% | |
| NEU | D | -0.6% | |
| LANC | C | -0.52% | |
| FHI | B | -0.51% | |
| IBOC | B | -0.49% | |
| ENS | F | -0.49% | |
| TEX | F | -0.48% | |
| SAM | C | -0.48% | |
| YETI | D | -0.48% | |
| NSP | F | -0.47% | |
| VC | F | -0.39% | |
| CXT | C | -0.35% | |
| CRI | F | -0.32% |
CSD: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
XMHQ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
