CHIC vs. IRBO ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF (CHIC) to iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (IRBO)
CHIC

Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF

CHIC Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the NASDAQ OMX China Technology Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on the securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to track the performance of the technology sector in China. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$12.25

Average Daily Volume

3,430

Number of Holdings *

8

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
IRBO

iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF

IRBO Description The investment seeks to track the investment results of NYSE® FactSet® Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its assets in the component securities of the underlying index and in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the component securities of the underlying index and may invest up to 10% of its assets in certain futures, options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents. The underlying index is composed of equity securities of companies primarily listed in one of 43 developed or emerging market countries that are the most involved in.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.31

Average Daily Volume

141,416

Number of Holdings *

69

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CHIC IRBO
30 Days 4.12% -1.94%
60 Days -10.40% -3.20%
90 Days -13.58% 1.06%
12 Months -24.22% 17.16%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CHIC Weight in IRBO Overlap
BIDU C 10.69% 0.8% 0.8%
IQ B 2.6% 1.03% 1.03%
YY C 2.79% 0.82% 0.82%
CHIC Overweight 5 Positions Relative to IRBO
Symbol Grade Weight
BZ A 3.47%
ATHM C 2.98%
BILI B 2.71%
WB C 2.14%
TME A 0.04%
CHIC Underweight 66 Positions Relative to IRBO
Symbol Grade Weight
MSTR D -2.22%
NVDA C -1.71%
MTTR B -1.6%
ARM F -1.46%
SPOT B -1.46%
META D -1.24%
GOOGL A -1.19%
AMD D -1.18%
QCOM A -1.17%
INFA D -1.14%
LSCC D -1.12%
GDDY A -1.12%
ABBV D -1.11%
HUBS D -1.11%
AMZN A -1.11%
NFLX D -1.1%
ISRG C -1.09%
PEGA D -1.06%
ALTR D -1.05%
TXN A -1.04%
ANSS D -1.03%
STLA D -1.03%
AME D -1.03%
SLAB D -1.02%
ADI A -1.01%
MCHP A -1.01%
MSFT C -0.99%
DOCN D -0.99%
CGNX B -0.97%
CRM D -0.96%
NNDM D -0.96%
BABA B -0.95%
SNAP B -0.94%
BSY B -0.93%
ORCL D -0.91%
ESTC C -0.89%
PINS A -0.89%
MOMO C -0.89%
ADSK D -0.88%
VMEO D -0.87%
SONY D -0.86%
GENI F -0.84%
CEVA D -0.84%
AAPL C -0.81%
CLVT F -0.81%
FRSH F -0.79%
STM F -0.79%
SNOW D -0.78%
DBX F -0.77%
PRLB F -0.77%
SSYS F -0.76%
LUMN F -0.75%
TDC F -0.72%
ADBE D -0.71%
PARA C -0.69%
AMBA F -0.68%
CXM D -0.67%
BMBL F -0.67%
INTC F -0.66%
SYM D -0.65%
SIRI F -0.56%
DDD F -0.54%
MVIS F -0.51%
PTON F -0.46%
FUBO F -0.38%
IRBT D -0.19%
Compare ETFs